Emerson Moore
بدور Director
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The رعب film الهروب من الحقل, starring Jordan Claire Robbins, Theo Rossi, Shane West, etc., directed by Emerson Moore, was released on May 6, 2022 in الولايات المتحدة. It tells the story of في إطار من التشويق، يستيقظ ستة غرباء في حقل أشبه بالمتاهة، وسرعان ما يجدوا أنفسهم مطاردين في مغامرة مروعة من أجل البقاة على قيد الحياة. This is a رعب, إثارة film with a runtime of 89 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 4.5/10 from 5,418 viewers.
Emerson Moore
بدور Director
Jordan Claire Robbins
بدور Sam
Theo Rossi
بدور Tyler
Shane West
بدور Ryan
Elena Juatco
بدور Denise
Julian Feder
بدور Ethan
Tahirah Sharif
بدور Cameron
Emerson Moore
بدور Businessman
Jeff Kress
بدور Creature
Shah Kahn
بدور Gas Mask Man #1
Ryan Stasyshyn
بدور Gas Mask Man #2
Scott Phillips
بدور Gas Mask Man #3
Keith Barnes
بدور Scientist
Niki Kerro
بدور Rachel
Emerson Moore
بدور Writer
Joshua Dobkin
بدور Writer
Sean Wathen
بدور Writer
قد تختلف التوافرية حسب البلد واللغة ونافذة الإصدار. بعض الأعمال تكون مضمنة في اشتراكات المنصات، بينما قد يتطلب بعضها الآخر الاستئجار أو الشراء أو الوصول عبر التطبيق. تُحدَّث كتالوجات البث واتفاقيات الترخيص بانتظام، لذا قد تتغير خيارات التشغيل بمرور الوقت. للحصول على أدق تجربة مشاهدة، راجع أحدث قائمة على الخدمة التي اخترتها وتأكد من الدعم الإقليمي وخيارات الترجمة وتوافق الجهاز قبل البدء.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 فوزاً و43 ترشيحاً إجمالاً
نزّل أحدث حزم MovieBox للجوال وإصدارات FM ونسخ APK المتوافقة مع التلفاز. اختر الحزمة المناسبة لجهازك ومنطقتك، ثم اتبع دليل التثبيت الرسمي للحصول على أفضل توافق وأمان.
فيلم جيد!
فيلم جيد!
This was not as bad as so many are saying. I have teenagers & preteens that love thrillers and scary movies and this worked out great for them to watch. There was no nudity/sex scenes and just mild gore, but yes people do get killed. This probably should have been rated PG-13 in my opinion. If you are looking for something to watch with your older kids this is not bad. Aside from the many F bombs, it's pretty mild. There are a few jump scares and intense scenes which was exactly what we wanted to experience. The mystery of it kept you guessing. The acting was good but not great. I think the movie could have used at least one character that stood out more or made you root for them more. The character development was just not there. A back story on how they got there or what they had in common or why they were chosen would have been a good subplot. So anyway here are the spoilers : I had figured this movie out as soon as Ryan gets injected with something and gets stronger and starts to change. I called it in front of my family and I was right.. Most people who are giving the bad reviews didn't watch the scene right after the ending credits which reveals what I was right about.. The whole thing is an experiment to see who can survive and it all revolves around what Ryan gets injected with. All the clues and the maze is just a distraction to wear them down. The experiment is repeated with new subjects until " they " get the results they want. Each new group goes through the same ordeal until one gets injected with the mystery concoction and goes crazy & changes and then that person hunts the new group until someone survives the hunter, then they get ready for " Phase 2 " which I assume there will be a sequel : maybe / maybe not. Overall I give this movie a 8 to help with the bad ratings but really I'd give it a 6 . It was different and entertaining and kept you guessing. The teens liked it.
Started off really well with a lot of interesting ideas and thought it was going to rival and beat the recent Stephen King Corn movie adaption but it seems the writer just copied the Stephen King movie and lost his way. I do like Theo Rossi but some really hammy acting from Shane West with his pseudo-hard man stare and the terrible acting from Jordan Clair Robbins had me wincing at the end and it is the usually woke casting letting it down too which did not help! The whole thing unravelled so quickly as did the tension and horror that the ending did not resolve anything and you are left with more queStions than answers - silly silly silly! Problem as with most low budgeters these days is they start off well then just go straight down the toilet and this is one of them and what was it with the mid credits end scene? It is as if it now has become a staple just to stick one in but in this case just for the sake of it. Sorry folks but this one is a Turkey and it is not even Christmas yet!
source: Escape the Field
These people seem like they haven't even watched the movie but got paid to write bad reviews. I liked the plot and it was really cute interesting compared to the stupid movies that are made nowadays.?pretty sure these people with bad reviews are the people who gives 10 to the king Richard.
This is newb producer, writer and director Emerson Moore's second film (with only one prior short), and it wasn't as bad as all these wannabe critics and their one's. Clearly it was a low budget B film, and all things considered, I've seen worse big budget Hollywood A-films lately. Moore's directing was actually impressive, with some great aerial shots, unexpected jump-scares, and fairly decent cast direction. Cinematography was spot-on, but it was the score - especially for a B film, that was perfection. This is a rarity in B films, where the score is always loud, overbearing, constant and unfitting. Even the pacing was decent for the 89 min runtime. There was however a huge missed opportunity with the writing; of the three writers, had one of them been somewhat a seasoned writer, the story could've been more cohesive. Although a refreshing and original take on the "escape room" genre films, there were some elements that could've been omitted, such as the red vile-filled dart and what followed, and other elements than needed more attention, such as a better narrative structure and more character development. I don't mind films that leave unanswered questions, but a little more clarity would've gone a long way. The ending wasn't bad either, but also had potential to be much more. Rookie mistakes aside, I still enjoyed this one, and it's a well deserved 7/10 for the newb filmmaker. I hope Moore takes advantage of the door he left open for a sequel.
Absolutely horrible. I know some movies ignore logic but this movie just ignores everything. Literally a waste of time. Please don't watch this movie. Nothing about it is good. Half way through the movie. I had way more questions then answers. It just seems like they just made the movie just because they could make it. This is why I don't like watching movies. I wasted my life watching this movie. Don't be like me. Skip this movie.
The actors don't know how to act. The movie is slow and boring. There is no action. I give this movie an F. I wasted my time with this film. It made me sleep.
There is no better way to say this than, it's impossible to enjoy this movie that leads to a non-ending with no conclusion, no revelations, nothing noteworthy explaining the mystery. And that's a pretty cardinal sin in a mystery movie. I would say watch "Into the tall grass" instead, also not an amazing movie, but better than this. I actually really enjoy movies like "Escape Room" and "Tournament of Champions", the cube, squid game and it feels like this movie wants to be one of those, but ends up being none of those. It's too bad, because the actors are working hard, it's shot well, effort has gone into this, truly. If you could reshoot the ending, make it a little longer, give it an actual ending, than it would work. But it's simply horrible in its current state. I'm kind of hoping this was a case of the studio or producers screwing this up, which still would be horrible, but then at least it wasn't the fault of the writers/director and the actors.
تحليل مفصّل لتغيّرات الأسعار الأخيرة، ولماذا يعيد المستخدمون النظر في إعدادات المشاهدة لديهم، وكيفية تقييم سير عمل بديل دون فقدان عادات الاكتشاف.
تعرّف على الطريقة الصحيحة لتثبيت Movie Box APK: أساسيات الإصدار أولاً، ثم خطوات التثبيت النظيف، وأخيراً كيفية الاختيار بين مسارات التلفاز وiOS والويب واستخدام التطبيق.
مراجعة موسّعة توضح لماذا يتميز Project Hail Mary في 2026: جودة الاقتباس، والسرد العلمي، والعمق العاطفي، وردود فعل الجمهور.
صُممت قصص الكوميديا للترفيه من خلال الفكاهة. تشمل الصيغ الشائعة الكوميديا الموقفية والكوميديا القائمة على المشاهد القصيرة وكوميديا العمل والكوميديا الرومانسية.
تركز أعمال الأكشن على الإثارة والصراع الجسدي والشخصيات البطولية والسرد السريع. غالباً ما تتضمن أعمال المغامرة الاستكشاف أو النجاة أو الرحلات الملحمية.
تتابع دراما الجريمة المحققين ورجال المباحث والمحامين أو الصحفيين أثناء حلهم القضايا الجنائية. وتشجع قصص الغموض الجمهور على اكتشاف الأدلة جنباً إلى جنب مع الشخصيات.
يستكشف الخيال العلمي التكنولوجيا المستقبلية والسفر عبر الفضاء والذكاء الاصطناعي والواقع البديل والتخمينات العلمية.
يخلق سرد الرعب التشويق عبر التوتر النفسي والأحداث الخارقة والوحوش أو سيناريوهات النجاة.
تركز القصص الرومانسية في المقام الأول على العلاقات وقصص الحب والتطور العاطفي بين الشخصيات.
تشمل الرسوم المتحركة أعمالاً للأطفال والعائلات والكبار، وتتراوح من المحتوى التعليمي إلى السرد الدرامي المعقد.
تركز القصص الرومانسية في المقام الأول على العلاقات وقصص الحب والتطور العاطفي بين الشخصيات.