Kathryn Bigelow
بدور Director
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The دراما film ثلاثون دقيقة بعد منتصف الليل, starring Jessica Chastain, Joel Edgerton, Chris Pratt, etc., directed by Kathryn Bigelow, was released on January 11, 2013 in الولايات المتحدة. It tells the story of وقائع مطاردات دامت حوالي عشر سنوات لأخطر رجل في التاريخ وزعيم تنظيم القاعدة أسامة بن لادن، بعد هجمات 9/11، ومصرعه على يد فريق من القوات الخاصة الامريكية في 6 مايو 2011. This is a دراما, تاريخ, إثارة film with a runtime of 157 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 7.4/10 from 338,446 viewers.
Kathryn Bigelow
بدور Director
Jessica Chastain
بدور Maya
Joel Edgerton
بدور Patrick - Squadron Team Leader
Chris Pratt
بدور Justin - DEVGRU
Jason Clarke
بدور Dan
Reda Kateb
بدور Ammar
Kyle Chandler
بدور Joseph Bradley
Jennifer Ehle
بدور Jessica
Harold Perrineau
بدور Jack
Jeremy Strong
بدور Thomas
J.J. Kandel
بدور J.J.
Wahab Sheikh
بدور Detainee on Monitor
Alexander Karim
بدور Detainee on Monitor
Nabil Elouahabi
بدور Detainee on Monitor
Aymen Hamdouchi
بدور Detainee on Monitor
Simon Abkarian
بدور Detainee on Monitor
Ali Marhyar
بدور Interrogator on Monitor
Parker Sawyers
بدور Interrogator on Monitor
Akin Gazi
بدور Interrogator on Monitor
Mark Boal
بدور Writer
قد تختلف التوافرية حسب البلد واللغة ونافذة الإصدار. بعض الأعمال تكون مضمنة في اشتراكات المنصات، بينما قد يتطلب بعضها الآخر الاستئجار أو الشراء أو الوصول عبر التطبيق. تُحدَّث كتالوجات البث واتفاقيات الترخيص بانتظام، لذا قد تتغير خيارات التشغيل بمرور الوقت. للحصول على أدق تجربة مشاهدة، راجع أحدث قائمة على الخدمة التي اخترتها وتأكد من الدعم الإقليمي وخيارات الترجمة وتوافق الجهاز قبل البدء.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 فوزاً و43 ترشيحاً إجمالاً
نزّل أحدث حزم MovieBox للجوال وإصدارات FM ونسخ APK المتوافقة مع التلفاز. اختر الحزمة المناسبة لجهازك ومنطقتك، ثم اتبع دليل التثبيت الرسمي للحصول على أفضل توافق وأمان.
فيلم جيد!
this movie is amazing. most of you commenting your village thing here can't even stand before phone camera not to talk about capturing machine.
top
I've seen all the reasons viewers (and some critics) dislike this film, but in my opinion it is infinitely superior to ARGO in its authenticity and dramatic quality. The final scenes, when the SEAL team, goes into Ben Laden's house, are brilliantly rendered. The idea of doing it mostly in the dark with flashes of illumination by "night vision" green is a brilliant touch, which most directors would never have attempted. The performances by Jessica Chastain, of course, Jason Clark and Jennifer Ehle are top drawer and the torture scenes, while brutal, are necessary--because that's the way it happened. Congratulations to Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal for getting it right. I don't want to put the knock on Argo, because I found it entertaining. But it's artificiality provides a distinct contrast with Zero Dark Thirity's authenticity, and authenticity wins.
Poor screenplay, poor dialogs, extremely bad actors and some strange and disturbing way of directing for a two hour and a half movie. The film is boring, the plot is childish and Maya it seems to be a little bit psychotic. Kathryn Bigelow tried the Hurt Locker recipe once again but this time her way to shoot just couldn't make anything understandable and bearable. Sometimes steady, most of time shaky, the camera is so confusing, especially in small spaces that you don't know what the director want to say anymore.... And the script is as shallow as a B series movie... Please don't loose your time. You'd better watch Tinke Taylor Soldier Spy or even Looper, at least you'll get entertain. Or if you want something European (because Bigelow it seem to me that she wants to copy some of the European ways to shoot images) take a look at Beyond the Hills. ;)
i came into this movie not expecting much after reading all the hatred and i honestly was blown away by both the movie and confusion at the negativity towards it. i agree that this movie painted a somewhat favorable light towards torture, but it never really once crossed my mind until i read the negative reviews based on it. i'm sorry, but to flat out dislike a movie based on your political/philosophical views probably means you shouldn't be writing a review in the first place. people also complain about the slowness of the movie. i honestly was riveted by it, from the first minute to the last. every single scene looked to create tension, drama, and purpose towards the goal of catching osama. how is that boring exactly? if anything, i felt the director was too shallow in that the movie seemed to favor over-dramatizing and simplification of the movie in favor of entertainment value; it was too entertaining if anything. i wouldn't have minded a more complex, subtle, and intelligent plot development. as far as character development goes, i agree that there wasn't much of it, but again i didn't even care until i read the negative reviews about it. i'm confused, because i thought this was a movie about the capture of osama bin laden, not shawshank redemption. the editing, characters, and pacing were very sharp and deliberate and they were supposed to be like that for the purposes of the movie and the content. the lack of character development in favor of a relentless pace and focus towards one singular goal to me 'was' the movie and i loved it for it. honestly, i'm dumbfounded by the negative reviews. i didn't want to like this movie. i was tired that night and i'm getting old and fall asleep frequently in movie theaters. this movie earned my attention and i was on the edge of my seat until the end credits. i've watched all the major movies this year and this is, in my opinion, the best film of the year.
I want to thank Kate B for adding to my knowledge. Really. I had no idea that Abbottabad was an Arabic-speaking city where most of the world's camels come to take a nap as the dunes of the desert silhouette them against the setting sun. After about the fifteenth person yells "Yalla! Aimshee!" you begin to wonder: couldn't they just have Wikipedia'd this stuff? It's written on that website that the national language of Pakistan is Urdu, right? Especially if one is to make a movie about an event a couple of years after it transpired, surely a little Googling would help? It's an error so enormous that it made me think, "If they got that wrong, why should I believe they got anything right?" It's grossly insulting and reminds me that one should never rely on others to represent oneself. "You don't understand Pakistan!" White Chick screams at her supervisor at one point. And you do? I wanted to ask. You, who just said "shukran" at a "bar" at the Marriot Hotel after you were served wine in a margarita glass? Overall disappointed with Kate B's lack of effort in representing such recent events in a realistic manner. Another edifice to lazy filmmaking and needless hype.
I was honestly expecting a lot more, given the multiple nominations for awards. I really thought this movie was overdone and could have been pared down by at least 45 minutes. In the end, it was just a glorified "we killed bin laden" pseudo-documentary. The character relationships never developed and seemed empty. And I didn't really find the main actress very believable or that great. Scenes of shooting dead bodies also were probably a bit too much -- overall this movie seemed overly nationalistic and simplistic without delivering much in the way of content. I thought Hurt Locker was a significantly better movie. Again, I am somewhat surprised at the number of award nominations this movie received.
فيلم جيد!
Well made, but my girlfriend and I fell a sleep in the movie theater, don't get me wrong it's a well made film, but three hours felt like nine hours. Last time I felt a sleep in the Theater was when I went to see "A Thin Red Line". Woke up during the torture scene and a few a minutes later ZZZzzz..If you have a bit of a short attention span for slow and heavy diologue films, I recommend to just rent the film and watch an hour at a time.It's a bit torturous, even with a torture scene in it lol! I don't think it's worth the Oscar nomination.There was a lot of stronger fims out there, that should've made the cut, this film is not one of them.
تحليل مفصّل لتغيّرات الأسعار الأخيرة، ولماذا يعيد المستخدمون النظر في إعدادات المشاهدة لديهم، وكيفية تقييم سير عمل بديل دون فقدان عادات الاكتشاف.
تعرّف على الطريقة الصحيحة لتثبيت Movie Box APK: أساسيات الإصدار أولاً، ثم خطوات التثبيت النظيف، وأخيراً كيفية الاختيار بين مسارات التلفاز وiOS والويب واستخدام التطبيق.
مراجعة موسّعة توضح لماذا يتميز Project Hail Mary في 2026: جودة الاقتباس، والسرد العلمي، والعمق العاطفي، وردود فعل الجمهور.
صُممت قصص الكوميديا للترفيه من خلال الفكاهة. تشمل الصيغ الشائعة الكوميديا الموقفية والكوميديا القائمة على المشاهد القصيرة وكوميديا العمل والكوميديا الرومانسية.
تركز أعمال الأكشن على الإثارة والصراع الجسدي والشخصيات البطولية والسرد السريع. غالباً ما تتضمن أعمال المغامرة الاستكشاف أو النجاة أو الرحلات الملحمية.
تتابع دراما الجريمة المحققين ورجال المباحث والمحامين أو الصحفيين أثناء حلهم القضايا الجنائية. وتشجع قصص الغموض الجمهور على اكتشاف الأدلة جنباً إلى جنب مع الشخصيات.
يستكشف الخيال العلمي التكنولوجيا المستقبلية والسفر عبر الفضاء والذكاء الاصطناعي والواقع البديل والتخمينات العلمية.
يخلق سرد الرعب التشويق عبر التوتر النفسي والأحداث الخارقة والوحوش أو سيناريوهات النجاة.
تركز القصص الرومانسية في المقام الأول على العلاقات وقصص الحب والتطور العاطفي بين الشخصيات.
تشمل الرسوم المتحركة أعمالاً للأطفال والعائلات والكبار، وتتراوح من المحتوى التعليمي إلى السرد الدرامي المعقد.
تركز القصص الرومانسية في المقام الأول على العلاقات وقصص الحب والتطور العاطفي بين الشخصيات.