Fear Street, partie 3 : 1666

🎬2021114h 0mÉtats-UnisHorreur, Mystère

English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,中文

6.6/1073,305 personnes ont noté

Regarder la vidéo

Description

The horreur film Fear Street, partie 3 : 1666, starring Kiana Madeira, Elizabeth Scopel, Benjamin Flores Jr., etc., directed by Leigh Janiak, was released on July 16, 2021 in États-Unis. It tells the story of Les origines de la malédiction qui poursuit Sarah Fier sont révélées pendant une nuit qui va changer la vie des habitants de Shadyside pour toujours. This is a Horreur, Mystère film with a runtime of 114 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 6.6/10 from 73,305 viewers.

Casting principal

Leigh Janiak

dans le rôle de Director

Kiana Madeira

dans le rôle de Sarah Fier

Kiana Madeira

dans le rôle de Deena

Elizabeth Scopel

dans le rôle de 'Real' Sarah Fier

Benjamin Flores Jr.

dans le rôle de Henry

Benjamin Flores Jr.

dans le rôle de Josh

Randy Havens

dans le rôle de George Fier

Julia Rehwald

dans le rôle de Lizzie

Julia Rehwald

dans le rôle de Kate

Matthew Zuk

dans le rôle de Elijah Goode

Matthew Zuk

dans le rôle de Mayor Will Goode

Fred Hechinger

dans le rôle de Isaac

Fred Hechinger

dans le rôle de Simon

Michael Chandler

dans le rôle de 'The Pastor' Cyrus Miller

Sadie Sink

dans le rôle de Constance

Sadie Sink

dans le rôle de Ziggy Berman

Emily Rudd

dans le rôle de Abigail

Emily Rudd

dans le rôle de Cindy Berman

Olivia Scott Welch

dans le rôle de Hannah Miller

Olivia Scott Welch

dans le rôle de Samantha Fraser

Lacy Camp

dans le rôle de Grace Miller

Lacy Camp

dans le rôle de Mrs. Fraser

McCabe Slye

dans le rôle de Mad Thomas

McCabe Slye

dans le rôle de Tommy Slater

Ashley Zukerman

dans le rôle de Solomon Goode

Ashley Zukerman

dans le rôle de Nick Goode

Jordana Spiro

dans le rôle de The Widow

Jordana Spiro

dans le rôle de Mrs. Lane

Jeremy Ford

dans le rôle de Caleb

Jeremy Ford

dans le rôle de Peter

Patrick Roper

dans le rôle de Union Townsman 1

Robert Bryan Davis

dans le rôle de Union Townsman 2

Phil Graziadei

dans le rôle de Writer

Leigh Janiak

dans le rôle de Writer

Kate Trefry

dans le rôle de Writer

R.L. Stine

dans le rôle de Writer

Où regarder

ailok.peSaeed Bhikhu

La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.

Lieu de tournage

127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands

Production

Castle Rock Entertainment

Récompense

21 victoires et 43 nominations au total

Obtenir l'APK MovieBox / FM / TV

Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.

Avis des utilisateurs

iamkabir..12/05/26 16:35

bhhgu

adilmrabbichow226/05/25 02:27

Bon film !

Abdallh20/08/24 12:04

I loved it. You will different atmosphere compared to last two parts.

Katlego20/08/24 12:04

In some ways, it is difficult to pinpoint where the Fear Street films go wrong. They are pleasant looking enough, with that typical Netflix-cinematic look that is neither offensive, nor interesting. The story also is a similar brand of innocuous typicality, despite the series' penchant for homage often leaning a little too far into imitation. And while the films are never scary, they do bring an atmosphere that might seem vaguely appealing to horror fans. Let me rephrase. In most ways, it is difficult to pinpoint where, if at all, the Fear Street films go right. "Fear Street: 1666," concludes Netflix's Fear Street trilogy in custom with the precedent laid out by the earlier two films; with a sloppily strung together mess of half-baked scares and substandard performances that never manage to elevate the lacklustre material. It feels awkward to approach the Fear Street films with such scrutiny-they're just Netflix movies. But perhaps someone should have told that to writer/director Leigh Janiak before she developed these films into the unpleasantly self-serious entities that they are. All three films, "1666," much included, never really figure out who they are intended for. In Janiak's heart of hearts, she must have wished to create the trilogy as a love-letter to the book series, and accordingly, to the now largely adult readers. This is apparent in the use of gore, sex and drugs that is distastefully smattered throughout the series in the most graceless of places. In any other manner however, it seems as though the films must be aimed at pre-teens. That is not to say that pre-teens would ever find themselves enjoying the mangled plot line that is only ever propelled by incessant teen drama, nor would they appreciate the performances and dialogue, which always seem to be in a constant race with one another to be the worst aspect of the film. And certainly, nobody would find themselves scared. But left then is the question of who is this series for? It is too gratuitous to be appropriate for younger individuals, too petty to appease older generations, and too insipid overall to satisfy just about any horror film enthusiast. I've got a lot to say about Fear Street, but only so many ways to say it. The films are bad. In their aspirations to echo the slasher films of the 80s and 90s, they manage only to mimic the the carapace; in Fear Street's efforts to emulate, it unflatteringly juxtaposes itself against films that it has not the wit, charm or soul to compete against. To the merit of "1666," however, this was the only film in the series wherein I felt that I could finally relate to the characters and story. After nearly six amalgamative hours of "Fear Street," films, it was reliving to finally have this moment, for as the credits rolled, I exited Netflix, turned off my computer, and realized that the three weeks were up, and that there were no more "Fear Street," films to come. In this way, I felt that I too had finally cast out a great evil that had plagued me for far too long.

Baptiste20/08/24 12:04

So in Part 1 the reanimated killers come back to life to kill the person who bled on the witch Sarah Fier's bones because ... I don't know. Reasons. But the characters make a point of saying the killers are passing right by everyone else and only going for the one who bled on the bones ... Except when they don't and they kill random people at the hospital. Whatever. Point is, you bleed on the witch's bones, she curses you and sends her goons after you. In Part 3 we find out Sarah Fier wasn't actually a witch, she was framed by Solomon, who was the actual person dealing with the devil. But the whole "reanimated killers are only going after the person who bled on the now non-witch's bones" rule is still in affect. Again, because ... Reasons. Except when they kill two cops in the mall even though they completely ignore everyone else and just follow the blood trails that were set up. Now the witch wasn't a witch, the Sheriff from the Solomon family tree is the actual bad guy, and nothing that happened previously makes sense anymore. It's not a plot twist if you break the rules you've set for the story. It's just bad writing. Wanted to like this series. Thought the second part was actually pretty good, albeit pointless once the third part came along. But overall, it was a trilogy of poorly done tropes thrown together into a nonsense plot. Better than some of the terrible horror films tossed out by Netflix. However, that doesn't mean it was a good series.

Pradeepthenext20/08/24 12:04

It's a typical Netflix Production. Decent budget, nice premise, nostalgic elements. Then the reality : At the beginning it looks promising, then it falls slowly apart but goes on and on until it feels like a chore to finish it. The story is dragged out and the twist are only surprising if one is truly not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree.

مشفشفه أسو ...19/07/24 12:23

Bon film !

ملك القصص 👑16/07/24 09:16

Bon film !

Saeed Bhikhu16/07/24 09:16

Bon film !

Adunni Ade29/05/23 22:50

Bon film !

Recommandations de films similaires

Blog

Types courants

Comédie

Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.

Action et aventure

Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.

Crime et mystère

Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.

Science-fiction

La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.

Horreur

Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.

Romance

Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.

Animation

L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.

Romance

Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.