10 000 Days

🎬201491h 0mÉtats-UnisScience-Fiction

English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,中文

2.8/10916 personnes ont noté

Regarder la vidéo

Description

The science-fiction film 10 000 Days, starring John Schneider, Peter Wingfield, James Harvey Ward, etc., directed by Eric Small, was released on November 23, 2014 in États-Unis. It tells the story of Ten thousand days ago, Comet 23 struck Earth with the magnitude of all the nuclear weapons in the world sending the planet into a deep freeze. Now, 27 years in the future, those who survived are locked in an epic battle of life or death. This is a Science-Fiction film with a runtime of 91 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 2.8/10 from 916 viewers.

Casting principal

Eric Small

dans le rôle de Director

John Schneider

dans le rôle de William Beck

Peter Wingfield

dans le rôle de Remy Farnwell

James Harvey Ward

dans le rôle de Lucas Beck

Kim Myers

dans le rôle de Veena Hesse

Lisa Pelikan

dans le rôle de Anna Hesse

Kenneth Meseroll

dans le rôle de Fred Hesse

Riley Smith

dans le rôle de Sam Beck

Jill Remez

dans le rôle de Rita Ruiz

Jay Montalvo

dans le rôle de David Ruiz

Jules Willcox

dans le rôle de Amelie Farnwell

Kelsey Sanders

dans le rôle de Kovita Hesse

Kasey Campbell

dans le rôle de Milo Beck

Blake Randall

dans le rôle de Cristo

Lydia Look

dans le rôle de Mariko Farnwell

Lewis Tan

dans le rôle de Jiro Farnwell

Kalani Queypo

dans le rôle de Ignacio

Cedric Sanders

dans le rôle de Louis

Eric Small

dans le rôle de Writer

Où regarder

fzmovies.netPaluuu🇱🇸🇱🇸

La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.

Lieu de tournage

127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands

Production

Castle Rock Entertainment

Récompense

21 victoires et 43 nominations au total

Obtenir l'APK MovieBox / FM / TV

Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.

Avis des utilisateurs

KXaIIv02/07/25 12:10

........

Oumou diaw02/06/23 02:09

Bon film !

Paluuu🇱🇸🇱🇸29/05/23 08:09

source: 10,000 Days

yayneaseged22/11/22 13:56

*Spoilers* "I know" that this "kinda cheap" version of an apocalyptic tv movie ... has been absolutely butchered by most reviewers, but I like where it was headed ... sort of. One thing I do not like is, there almost ALWAYS has to be that one IDIOT voice of contention ... who always thinks you have to KILL and TAKE everything you want, and not just stay a part of the community and work together, for the greater good. The "bad guys" (so-to-speak), are actually mostly family members of the "good guys", who just did not want to get along with everyone else. They've gone to calling themselves "clans", living out on the ice, and spending every waking moment plotting how to take what appears to be the only remaining building left on the planet, away from the good guys ... (oh, if you coulda just got along with everyone else and STAYED THERE in the first place)! What appears to be a kind of "saving grace" is, towards the last third of the show, they (good guys) actually find AIR FORCE ONE under the ice. Needless to say, there are some things on board that could significantly help a group who is just trying to survive. BUT, there is also something on board that could destroy any hope of ever having anything close to a return to something close to a regular life (the "bad guys" find out about this because of a Romeo & Juliet kind of relationship between a good GUY and a bad GIRL). She tells about the discovery because, evidently, Big Daddy King bad guy, is not above threatening the lives of children (who he claims he's trying to SAVE), to make "Juliet" divulge how to sneek into the "good guy" building, to steal their equipment). At the very end, we discover something that can change everyone's entire way of life (if only they can check it out, verify the "hope", and get back in time to tell everyone before the bad guys start the war to end all existence)! Seems worth another "movie of the week ... or two", or even one or two short seasons on "hoodoo, voodoo, yoohoo, or some other streaming service", etc. But, we already know THAT didn't happen. I would like to have seen if they coulda made it more interesting, with a little more time?

22/11/22 13:56

The film take places 10,000 days into the future after the big one, COMET 23 strikes the earth. The earth is not destroyed but knocked out of orbit. Through a freakish occurrence only two family clans survive and are feuding. The bad guy wears black and a large hat that looks like a Darth Vader helmet. The Becks (good clan) discover Air Force One and may be able to launch nuclear weapons and heat up the frozen earth. Toss in a kid and a Romeo and Juliet element and you get the idea. I like the idea, somewhat. Okay I got past the fact the earth wasn't destroyed, nor was our rotation or axis tilt altered at all. I never did understand why they didn't leave Colorado and head toward the equator if heat was an issue. Their power generation and greenhouse abilities needed explanation that didn't come. All of that would have been fine, even with the CG background, if they had created just one decent character. The acting and dialogue was horrendous. The characters were unrealistic, perhaps more so than the plot. My advice is to go watch "The Colony" again or better yet, "Snow Piercer". No F-bombs, sex, or nudity.

Sup...22/11/22 13:56

Ninety minutes of my life that I cannot get back. Bo Duke has done much, much better. I guess there were bills to pay. It was as if someone came onto the film set and repossessed the equipment and they had to suddenly end the film abruptly. At first I thought there was potential and the bad CGI effects were forgiven; but, even the bad acting and poor dialogue were made even worse by the most awful movie ending I've seen in 50 years. At least reading the review entitled "rats cannot vomit" gave me a good laugh (nicely done!). Stay away from this one.

KabzaDeSmall22/11/22 13:56

Copious amounts of margaritas got me through this movie. Decent story, but some of the acting was just plain terrible. The ending is disturbing. It's like they run out of money and had to shoot the last 10 minutes of the movie in 10 minutes Anyway, I will never watch this movie again, but it was still better than many other Hollywood movies that have much bigger budgets. Because I had very many margaritas, I feel generous and I'll give this movie 6 stars.

مالك_جمال22/11/22 13:56

I thought this was better than expected so I was entertained even with a weak story line. The end as mention by others, was abrupt and unsatisfying, all I can think of was this was a pilot movie for a TV series that when no place.

thatkidfromschool22/11/22 13:56

Yeah, this is my very first review, but just trust me on this one. This is a "movie" made by stitching up fragments of what was meant to be a 12-episode series. Is this all? I wish. First, the special effects are really B-grade. I mean, seriously cheap stuff and lots of green screen which is blatantly obvious. Secondly, the plot is laughable. ==For the record, even though I cannot possibly fathom why you'd watch this thing, SPOILER ALERT. Major spoilers from now on.== I mean, picture this: you and your clan are barely surviving in what looks like a frozen wasteland up on the mountains in some "observatory", for f#ck's sake. Moreover, another clan wants said observatory and your ass. You go to explore some under-ice cavern and all of a sudden, Airforce-bloody-One falls down after some tremor. In one piece. Wings and all. You go inside, find everyone frozen solid. So, what do you get from, I repeat, Airforce-bloody-One? Food? Nope. Medical supplies? Noooooo... Guns? Nah. Batteries? Flashlights? Clothes? None of the above. Instead, they get the... wait for it... black boxes of the plane (!!!) and some nondescript radio-looking thing (the size of a cell phone) that allows them to... communicate with the US nuclear silos. Obviously, the black boxes themselves have a 3.5" audio jack and a play button, so you just hook it up and listen. Right? Do. Not. Think. So. Thirdly, the science is beyond laughable. I mean, these guys didn't even ask a high-school graduate about the scientific validity of the plot, let alone a real physicist. Get a hold of this: the earth is struck by a *comet*, which knocks it off its orbit around the sun (hence the frozen wasteland) and they want to re-warm the area by using a few nuclear warheads. I mean, where do I even start with this? A. any celestial body big enough to knock earth off its orbit in any substantial manner, would have vaporised half the earth's crust and sent the entire planet back to the state it was a few billion years ago, i.e. ball of molten lava. Or almost that. B. you cannot re-warm an area for any significant amount of time by using nuclear bombs. Sure, if you calculate it precisely, you could thaw out a few square kilometres, but in a "snowball earth" scenario, it would freeze right back within a few hours. Not before irradiating said surface and you with it, though, with lethal amounts of all sorts of sugar and spice. C. You cannot and do not charge batteries and flashlights by rubbing wool! Static electricity does not work this way! D. People do not die when the vehicle they're in hits a bump (and a moderate one at that) and they positively do not come back to life spontaneously, a minute after CPR. Finally, the so-called movie ends, not with a bang, not with a conclusion, but, because it was meant to be a TV series, with a cliffhanger! But not before ruining 90 minutes of your life with ridiculous ice-pick fights, complete with axes and walking sticks, people who survive apparently polar conditions yet their only barrier from the below-zero conditions is an ordinary metal door (!). Oh, and the bad guys live in ice caves. So, is that enough for you? If you want more and your life is 90 minutes too full of worthwhile things to do, by all means, go ahead and watch it. If you want to watch a movie that actually makes sense, even in a distant, remote kind of way, distance yourself from this abomination correspondingly. You *can* do better than this.

برنس الليالي22/11/22 13:56

10,000 Days is all about potential wasted, and I blame the director. There were certain things that were in place to work for this movie. The premise was actually okay. A few changes to the storyline, and it would have been great. The film stock was high quality; not the typical SyFy movie camcorder variety. The CGI was not horrendous. And the actors took their lines seriously, although I had issues with one character oddly talking like he was a leftover from a 300 movie, and some typical whiny women who have the maternal instinct thing going way past annoying. The main issue with the movie, though, is that it isn't interesting. It's dull, draggy, too much dialog, and the plot is incoherent. I was waiting for something to happen, but nothing ever did. Even the characters looked as bored as I was. Because it was so uninspiring, I couldn't keep my attention, and thus, the storyline started to not make sense to me. I don't mind a bad movie that should have been bad from the get-go. But movies that have potential, but are ruined by poor direction, are nothing less that shameful, especially considering how hard it is to get a movie produced these days. Wasted opportunity and effort, guys. 2/10.

Recommandations de films similaires

Blog

Types courants

Comédie

Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.

Action et aventure

Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.

Crime et mystère

Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.

Science-fiction

La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.

Horreur

Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.

Romance

Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.

Animation

L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.

Romance

Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.