Adam Orton
dans le rôle de Director
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The drame film Amelia 2.0, starring Ed Begley Jr., Debra Wilson, Kate Vernon, etc., directed by Adam Orton, was released on February 12, 2021 in États-Unis. It tells the story of when the husband of a dying woman is approached by a corporation pioneering a new program to extend life through robotics, they get caught in a public debate over human's relationship with technology. This is a Drame, Romance, Science-Fiction film with a runtime of 89 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 5.3/10 from 2,114 viewers.
Adam Orton
dans le rôle de Director
Ed Begley Jr.
dans le rôle de Paul Wesley
Debra Wilson
dans le rôle de Adah Allen
Kate Vernon
dans le rôle de Dr. Ellen Beckett
Eddie Jemison
dans le rôle de Max Parker
Kamar de los Reyes
dans le rôle de Vaughn
Chris Ellis
dans le rôle de Senator Thaddeus
John Livingston
dans le rôle de Sam Patterson
Malcolm Danare
dans le rôle de Adam
Rachelle Carson-Begley
dans le rôle de Sara Conrad
Alexandra Vino
dans le rôle de Jessica Stone
Elaine Ivy Harris
dans le rôle de Computer
Ben Whitehair
dans le rôle de Carter Summerland
Enrico Natale
dans le rôle de Dennis
Jesse Henecke
dans le rôle de Grant Barker
Mershad Torabi
dans le rôle de Casey
Malorie Mackey
dans le rôle de Sinndy
Ben Rollins
dans le rôle de Drunk Man
Rob Merritt
dans le rôle de Robert
Rob Merritt
dans le rôle de Writer
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
source: Amelia 2.0
Not having the critical acuity of Roger Ebert, I judge movies entirely by how much money I want back on the way out of the theatre. Watching Amelia 2.0 was delightful entertainment throughout and I didn't want any money back (though I found the popcorn overpriced). I am not a sci-fi fan. In 1977 I demanded and got my $4 back after a screening of Star Wars (but am still awaiting the public apology). Amelia 2.0 did not put me in mind of Star Wars and all that cgi gimcrackery, but did put me in mind of the 1978 movie Coma, after which I did not want any money back. All I remember about Coma - except Genevieve Bujold - is that it had something to do with malevolent forces and futuristic genetic manipulations and that I was satisfied with it. That's how I feel about Amelia 2.0. Enjoy the movie.
If the teenage son of the owner of a local news station had to do a term paper for a first year philosophy class, and the news station owner decided it might get a better grade if it was a video, and told the crew at the station to make it, the video might come out something like "Amelia 2.0". It's difficult to compare it to a movie or even a TV show because nowadays those almost always have relatively skilled professionals working on them, even if they have no talent. Regardless, the video addresses an interesting topic, but not in any meaningful way, and without the usual dramatic elements of fiction, even at the level of a docudrama or biopic. It does have some competent professional actors, but they weren't given actual characters to portray, so it's sort of like they walked in off the street and were given lines to read. The editing was pretty tight though.
I actually enjoyed this movie. It's not as challenging as it could be but there are some interesting twists and turns and all the leads put in good performances. The main question of the film is: has whatever makes up the 'soul' of Amelia been transferred to the android body, or is it just a computer copy (a simple copy and paste)? From parts of the procedure it looks like it's the latter, with the process called 'mapping' rather than a transfer. So if you follow that line of thought then the rest of the film is rather pointless. But if you think the scientists have really managed to transfer Amelia into the android then the arguments put forward have more depth. The scenes with the senator who opposes all such research are well-written, especially as he faces his own mortality. I'm not sure about the bit just before the end where the corporation decides to use the Amelia mapping data to create androids for everyone. If they truly believed they had transferred Amelia into the android then they would be (effectively) cloning her thousands of times over and then allowing people to reprogram her - not something an ethical corporation should do. Mind you, we're left in no doubt that ethics are not on the mind of the corporation. Just the doctor - who is then left out of the loop. The other ending - where the husband takes matters into his own hands - was much more satisfying and is probably where the film should have ended. Though finishing it with Amelia taking her own decision worked as well. It's not that demanding a film but it is thought-provoking is certain ways. Another reviewer bemoaned the CGI of the helicopter on the roof of the corporation and it IS dodgy, but mercifully brief. Other shots of the corporate HQ are also brief (and some at night) and are much better. And yes, there are comparisons to Ex Machina in the plot line but as I found that film very predictable and this one at least had a twist towards the end then I'd recommend an unchallenging viewing of this film on a lazy evening.
Some people have compared it to a modern Frankenstein story, but I don't think that this particular concept was appreciated for what it really was. Living in a modern world has led everyone of us to feel at one point that we live in a paper cup society where everything is or could be replaceable. This movie represents exactly what it was meant to represent "all science, no philosophy". It's all these questions that we want answers to, knowing full well that we won't get them because we're not meant to know, just like we're not meant to live forever. These questions will continue to haunt our society long after we're gone, only to one day come to the realization of what we all knew all along that our arrogance will be the catalyst of our own demise.
This was a movie made on a low budget, and I feel they did a fantastic job. I feel the strongest acting came from the supporting roles, but overall, great acting. Some people classify this as a science fiction movie, which it is, however, I feel the underlying message of love and existence and morality is what is meant to be delivered through the science fiction setting. It really does inspire you to think about which side of the issue you stand on. In my case, I changed my viewpoint a few different times throughout the movie. I felt the sound design could have use a little more support and a little slow-going in the first 10 minutes or so of the movie, but I would watch this movie again, and recommend it to my friends. Hats off to everyone involved in making this film. You all did a fantastic job.
Adam Orton is a promising young Director with great attention to detail. I can't wait to see what he'll make next! A independent film is a challenge to make on a low budget, but the creative team overcame the special effects obstacles, and the performances were exceptional! With the vision of the director, the editor was able to construct a high concept story into something vivid the audience can enjoy.
This was a blatant attack on Republican conservatives making them out as the bad guy wrapped into a badly acted Sci,-Fi movie
This movie has provoked a hidden curiosity, maybe more so fear in me of how technology can/will dangerously minimize our human abilities. I think it's an important movie. It produces a motivation for education on what is to come for us in the not so distant future. Making the choice to deny our natural human emotions whether they are pain or joy, will have a negative consequence on all of humanity,makes me want to teach my grandchildren to garden, and build things so they don't forget what that is.. K.S.
This movie is a story of Amelia who lived with her husband but one day bad luck strikes she dies at a young age so a company approaches her husband telling him that they have a way to bring her back. The story line was good but I don't think people are going to be very impressed after watching this movie because we have encountered many movies with this same kind of stories. The girl who did Amelia could have done a better job cause at some scenes of this movie when she becomes all bubbly she sounds like a retard. But rest of the actors did a good job. The ending was good and unpredictable. Yes i would ask everyone to give this movie a shot I know you guys have encountered movies like this before. My Rating 6/10
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.