Katherine Waterston
dans le rôle de Samantha
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,中文
The mystère film Enter Nowhere, starring Katherine Waterston, Scott Eastwood, Sara Paxton, etc., directed by an unlisted director, was released on April 4, 2014 in États-Unis. It tells the story of Trois personnes, qui ne se connaissent pas, se retrouvent dans une mystérieuse cabane au milieu de nulle part et découvrent qu'elles y ont été amenées ensemble pour une raison. This is a Mystère, Science-Fiction, Thriller film with a runtime of 90 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 6.4/10 from 14,742 viewers.
Katherine Waterston
dans le rôle de Samantha
Scott Eastwood
dans le rôle de Tom
Sara Paxton
dans le rôle de Jody
Shaun Sipos
dans le rôle de Hans
Christopher Denham
dans le rôle de Kevin
Jesse Perez
dans le rôle de Attendant
Leigh Lezark
dans le rôle de Young Woman
Vic Finalborgo
dans le rôle de Priest
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
Bon film !
Three strangers arrive one by one at a mysterious cabin in the middle of nowhere. Slowly they realize that they are trapped there and no matter how hard they try to leave they can't because in whichever direction they go, they return to the exact same cabin! Things become more bizarre when the three begin to talk and are sure the cabin they are stuck in is in different geographical US states. It seems they were hundreds of miles apart from each other and had traveled only for a little time and yet they've reached each other at this cabin! It's geographically impossible. They must be 100s of miles apart. So in which US state is this cabin exactly? How have they reached each other without traveling for days? Odder still they each believe the year is different. One character says it is 1962, while the other says it's 1985 and for the third it 2011!Frankly, this is an excellent, unknown, bizarre yet entertaining movie! The story is brand new and not a rehash of old stuff one has seen countless times. The starting itself is strong and happenings unpredictable, and the ending is a major twist that one will not see coming from miles away. It's emotional, and for the running time I felt like I was trapped in the bizarre situation along with the characters. As a writer I tried to think what was happening and predict the end and yet it left me baffled, bamboozled and bowled over! It's claustrophobic and tense. A rare 'locked-room' thriller, limited characters, limited locations and limited budgets but not limited in imagination, ideas, and writing.
The plot is okay-ish at best, as long as you don't think too hard about it (I don't think even the writers did, so...). Acting and directing is very poor. Characters are not likable and their reactions are unnatural 70% of the time. A huge waste of time.
What starts as your generic suspenseful, broken down in the middle of nowhere, there's a cabin, who are you, how did you get here, etc etc movie becomes a putting the pieces together, well made film (think I ran on there for a second). Watch it!!
I got this movie from Netflix not knowing what to expect, and, boy, did it surprise me! It was one of those movies that works well-make that brilliantly-with a limited cast and setting and an eerie plot. It starts off with Sara Paxton robbing a convenience store. She winds up at a cabin in the middle of the woods with two strangers. They all have no explanation as to why they are there with rational explanations as to HOW. Why they are there is unraveled throughout the course of the movie. They cannot escape as each person seems strange to each other. Everything is revealed in clues, premonitions, and dialogue (sometimes humorously!) along the way as the creepy and scary atmosphere persists. The acting and writing were all great in this gem-I was very glad I got this. It was far from a classic but not bad either. ** 1/2 out of ****
Like many, after reading so many positive and compeling reviews I felt the urge to watch Enter Nowhere, as I thought it would be a great science fiction movie, as "advertised". The movie is plain bad. As you have may read, the story revolves about three strangers that arrive at a cabin in the woods and soon realise they are there for a reason. OK, so there is a mystery, but it isn't interesting enough, first because of the poor script. The script just doesn't engage the viewer, it's too far fetched, it doesn't explain anything, stuff just happen and you should act like the "whys" and "whos" don't matter and don't exist. Second: the acting...It's bad. It's like they're reading the lines directly from paper. There is no emotion, nothing...Just bad. I won't drag this too much, because this movie lacks quality in every aspect. I can't in good conscience recommend this movie unless to those who want to watch a "B" movie and increase their viewed movies library. To those who seek entertainment, an interesting story, something new and fresh, don't watch this one. It's bad...
About 20 minutes in to this movie I thought the movie was going in the same direction as so many others that I have seen, but it didn't and it really took me by surprise as the story slowly started to unfold. The movie went in a totally different direction and I highly recommend this to true fans of the horror genre. This is quite a treat for people like me who see tons of horror flicks and are constantly looking for something good to watch, but are constantly let down. So give it a shot if your a die hard genre fan like me and are into strange supernatural horror. There isn't a ton of gore in this film, its more of a cerebral supernatural thriller which is good every once in awhile. I have no idea why this movie is rated so low here, but I'm not surprised. Truth be told, its a solid 7. I gave this 9 stars to help give it a push out of the hole its in. It does great with the small budget it had. Good production, convincing actors, and an overall intelligent story. I won't stick my neck out and say cult classic like another reviewer here, but definitely a great way to kill an hour and a half and definitely an excellent low budget horror film. Hell, Id have even paid for it!
This is an interesting little film. Little because the production budget looks tiny and in total there are no more than 8 or so characters overall! It starts off as a typical cabin in the woods scenario and sure enough soon walks in a man with an axe. But before you can get ready for the gore to begin the story takes a different turn. Maybe not so different but the overall tone develops in to a psychological thriller scenario and although the twist isn't something to write home about, its certainly unexpected. The director drops many small hints as to what is going on and later they become funny reminders. Not epic film making but an entertaining story that is short and tight. Production value is low due to the budget and has some amateurish cgi. Acting is so so and in particular Katherine Waterston overacts in her scenes. Overall a neat little story that is both entertaining and immediately forgettable.
I've seen this movie twice, the first time was years ago I remember it being a bit slow but feeling worthwhile in the end. The second time I watched it (yesterday) I thought that the beginning is indeed mindnumbingly slow and was really bored for the most part of the first hour but after the hour had past I started to understand just why I decided to rewatch it in the first place, cause the ending throws a cool twist on you. But in the end we have to judge a movie as a whole and not just based on the fact that it finally got good in the last 25 minutes, and the first hour really is not that great at all, even less so on the rewatch because every little clue is so amazingly obvious. The acting is okay, the characters don't really feel all that real though a bit stereotypical. So maybe just watch one time if it's on cable or something.
This movie was enough to keep my interest from the beginning, it was okay, but I can only give it a four because to me it was just a drawn out Twilight Zone episode. I did however enjoy the fact there were not very many CGS scenes. I liked the way it was filmed, maybe because of budget costs, but they did do good for what they had to work with. Actually, I think if they had had a bigger budget they would have done great! The actors they picked played the parts well. What a real surprise was that they were pretty good at picking out the costumes for each character without giving anything away of the plot. So for all in all a four. I don't know if this studio has done anymore films but I would be interested in finding out more. Peace!
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.