Family Practice Mysteries: Coming Home

🎬202484h 0mCanadaMystère

English

6.7/10786 personnes ont noté

Regarder la vidéo

Description

The mystère film Family Practice Mysteries: Coming Home, starring Amanda Schull, Brendan Penny, Gerard Plunkett, etc., directed by Michael Robison, was released on May 2, 2024 in Canada. It tells the story of A former Army surgeon moves back to her hometown and joins a practice of family doctors, but when she's drawn into solving the mysterious death of a patient, her quiet life becomes upended. This is a Mystère film with a runtime of 84 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 6.7/10 from 786 viewers.

Casting principal

Michael Robison

dans le rôle de Director

Amanda Schull

dans le rôle de Rachel

Brendan Penny

dans le rôle de Jack

Gerard Plunkett

dans le rôle de Rick Davis

Isla Crerar

dans le rôle de Chloe Hunt

Jett Klyne

dans le rôle de Matthew Hunt

Christopher Shyer

dans le rôle de Leonard Alexander

Kendall Cross

dans le rôle de Meredith Alexander

Link Baker

dans le rôle de Phil

Link Baker

dans le rôle de Man in Mask #1

Hugo Steele

dans le rôle de Man #2

Sunita Prasad

dans le rôle de Melody Bergen

Reese Alexander

dans le rôle de David Cooper

Ian Collins

dans le rôle de Avery Smith

Greg Kean

dans le rôle de Ross Alexander

Tony Alcantar

dans le rôle de Michael Davrow

Milo Shandel

dans le rôle de Dave Stringer

Niki Garcia

dans le rôle de Abby Jones

Linda Ko

dans le rôle de Coroner

Christine Cattell

dans le rôle de Lynn Johnson

Barry M. Schkolnick

dans le rôle de Writer

Où regarder

fzmovies.netMerhawi🌴

La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.

Lieu de tournage

127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands

Production

Castle Rock Entertainment

Récompense

21 victoires et 43 nominations au total

Obtenir l'APK MovieBox / FM / TV

Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.

Avis des utilisateurs

its.Kyara.bxtchs21/03/26 14:11

Bon film !

Merhawi🌴24/07/24 16:31

source: Family Practice Mysteries: Coming Home

Buboy Villar24/07/24 16:31

What is a doctor doing messing around in investigating? Why do so many of these Hallmark Mysteries have implausible plots? How many doctors have the free time to go around investigating a murder? Surely she has some patients?? A. She has two kids. They have just moved to a new town and school. Surely she could be putting her efforts to helping her kids adjust? B. She is NOT a detective. She meets up with the real detective, cutie Brendon Penny while looking to adopt a pet. C. Through her meddling, she runs into some nasty people and is making herself a target!! D. The actual detective never answers his phone!! SERIOUSLY???? E. Fat chance a detective would allow non-police to look through files. F. Another fat chance a detective would allow non-police to listen in to interviews with the suspects. Naturally, during her investigations, she gets caught by the baddies. TOTALLY PREDICTABLE!! Now she does knows some good kung fu in order to get away from the baddies. However, PLEASE GET BACK TO YOUR OFFICE!!! "She did this all for the money- Makes no sense." SERIOUSLY!!! Of course THAT makes sense as a motive for murder!!

raiapsara3124/07/24 16:31

I enjoy most of the Hallmark Mysteries. Some are better than others, and all follow a bit of a formula, but the twisted and turns in each is different. The actors, almost without exception, are strong personalities that fit the roles well. Both the female and male leads and supporting actors bring excitement to their characters. It's great to see new mysteries and this one seems real with its depiction of a military vet returning to civilian life. This will be a great addition, though we still miss some of our favorites like Gourmet Detective and Mystery 101. I look forward to seeing this and more of the coming mysteries on Hallmark.

stacy n. clarke24/07/24 16:27

I have always enjoyed the Hallmark Mystery franchises but the last two entries have been very disappointing. 'The Curious Caterer' has annoyed avid readers of the books with its unnecessary deviations and I just hated seeing two of my favorite strong lead actors struggling to get through it. Andrew W. Walker seemed so uncomfortable in his role. This one was even worse. The two leads are not as strong in general so they had no chance of rescuing this dreadful and poorly directed script. Amanda Schull is seasoned but here her delivery was flat and boring. There was no chemistry between her and Brendan Perry, the detective. She always seemed on edge and in spite of speaking very slowly and deliberately she lacked any emotion. She was a military doctor in the field before her husband's death so perhaps her restraint was how the director wanted the character to behave. But coupled with the poorly written dialogue it didn't work. After her obsession took hold to find a murder where none was apparent, we no longer saw her doing any medical work with patients. She just plunged into pestering everyone for an autopsy and interviewing everyone as if she were the police chief once murder was established. Brendan Perry was a one-man police force it seems. (It would appear they lost their 'police station' location or perhaps they couldn't afford it or the additional actors or the uniform rentals). He was also not a very good one and he gave her even more access to the investigation than Andrew W. Walker in 'Curious Caterer'. He wasn't at all upset by her discussing all the important details of an on-going police investigation with everyone she met. Of course, perhaps it was partly because he wasn't doing any of the investigating. I couldn't understand why anyone would answer her questions and only once did the victim's brother ask her outright why she was interrogating them and accepted her lame excuse that she had been his doctor. Perry also allowed her to watch his official interrogations so I began to wonder what alternate universe we were in. Even a very small town would surely draw a line there. The movie appeared to be a very low budget, rushed, indie production. Most of the cast were 2nd rate (probably local actors) and the few background actors they could afford were distracting in scenes by walking aimlessly back and fro or being poorly placed by an uninspired director. None of this helped Schull's wooden and Perry's bland performances. Even as a Hallmark rom com lead, he just delivers his lines as if he's reading them. He rarely "listens and reacts" ... acting 101. The story was so lacking luster it's not worth describing. The murderer was obvious from the start. I fell asleep and had to rewind to finish it.

Noella Joline24/07/24 16:27

The script on this episode needed drastic fixes to get it up to speed as a well-written mystery, but it's too late now. The usual Hallmark cringey scenes were also dialed up to extra-cringey in this one. On to the issues. Our hero, the doctor, was wildly incompetent. Her kids and live-in Dad provided the needed investigation expertise when she hit a wall over basic investigation and logic concepts. Dad functioned like an all-seeing oracle for some reason. The cops also inexplicably inserted her into the department to monitor witness statements and suspect interviews. They cops also didn't seem to care that the doctor went around blabbing about every major case detail to anybody and everybody, even possible suspects. Other logic problems were sprinkled throughout. The state of the crime scene was a major red flag that nobody bothered to mention, not the cops or the coroner. The coroner was so incompetent that her behavior stood out as author intrusion in our story; she would never have been allowed on the job being that dumb. The show had the cozy mystery setting, but beyond that, it needed serious work in every other department. We barely made it through to the end.

MinnieDlamini24/07/24 16:27

I've been watching these Hallmark Murder Mysteries series for many years and try to go into each and every one of them with an open mind. Sure, they're low budget, shot in BC, with a mid-level stable of competent Canadian and American actors, and written by screenwriters with a background of churning out simple, paint by numbers scripts that are never profoundly clever (I know who the killer is and why they did it 20 minutes into each movie)... But what really irritates me, as of late, is how Upper Middle Class, White and privileged the characters all are. Leads & supporting all have fabulous jobs and live in 3 million dollar homes, with granite kitchen islands, glorious bay windows, 4 bedrooms/5 baths and a back yard you can play football in. Their cars all cost $60k+ and their clothes are effortlessly classy. Frankly, I just want to bash their faces in! Look, it's fine to watch aspirational characters onscreen, getting into trouble and solving crimes. But I've been a TV writer & producer for many years and very much want my characters -- all still clever, talented and determined -- to live in 2 bedroom rental apartments, work as a waitress, janitor or retail clerk, and get their clothes & home decor at Walmart! Audiences can RELATE to those people and not hate/resent them for living a lifestyle they will never, ever have.

user30342124/07/24 16:27

I really looked forward to this movie. The premise was interesting and, frankly, several of Hallmark's latest entries were really bad. One of my problems here was the female lead who was "staying strong" for her children but projected emotionless concern. She was so in control that even when she fostered a patient's dog, it was cold and cautious. Her 2 children want a dog-high schoolers-but she keeps saying it's a big responsibility over and over. No response to the possibility that perhaps they need the pet to help them heal. She has to assess and reassess everything by what she thinks. Bringing home a puppy without involving the children at the end? I guess it keeps her in control. She pushes for an autopsy of a patient who died suddenly, again it all seems intellectual. When she and the detective, obviously, go beyond just looking at the case, it felt forced. Why move forward on the personal level when just solving the case would suffice? She's widowed, served in Afghanistan and has 2 children. Adjustment time, please. This series shows promise but needs warmth. Lastly-why are offices and homes so poorly lighted! I don't sit in a dark doctor's office.

Lindiwe Veronica Bok24/07/24 16:27

Let's begin clarifying that I found the characters appealing. Amanda Schull is lovely in her role. Dr Rachel is a kind, wholesome person. Brendan Penny has a charming, solid male role, as Detective Jack. Even their sentimental interaction is played with subtle, gentle touch. The mystery is somewhat convoluted, yet acceptably engaging. Where the shows falls apart is in the details, that some may want to overlook, if concentrating in the pleasantness of the characters, but disturbing to any viewer who approached the thriller with a critical mind. As seen in other Hallmark mysteries, it makes poor sense that an amateur sleuth, a family practice physician in the present one, could go around meddling with official police investigation so easily. Why should all possible suspects even pay attention to her inquisitions? And why should the detective in charge let her get involved and share in his investigations? Then, the highly intelligent and inquisitive physician is portrayed as a medical jackass. How could a physician ordered an MRI, just to please a patient, clinically in excellent shape, to screen for a prostate cancer? It is an idiotic abuse of an expensive test, and a choice that would make a physician fail any examination, besides never been approved by any Insurance plan. And how could she make a firm diagnosis of "diverticulitis" in a patient just admitted in hospital?. While the diagnosis should be suspected as a possible cause of symptoms, it would take time and complex testing to prove it. And How could a family practitioner spend considerable time meddling in a police investigation for days? Does she not have patients to attend? Then, before the cause of the victim's death is known, Jack states that a suspect had a solid alibi. How does he know what time the alibi should cover? Unfortunately, the above is nothing, compared to the main issue. The coroner in the case is made to look like an unprofessional idiot. How could a M. E. dogmatically state that a man, apparently in excellent health and found suddenly dead, has died of natural causes and no autopsy is needed? If the law has not recently changed, the event requires a certificate of cause of death by an attending physician. In this situation the only attending physician would and could not sign such document, in all conscience. By law, an autopsy should have been mandatory and exhaustive enough to keep searching for a cause. No coroner should be satisfied to declare the death as due to natural causes, if the initial results of the autopsy reveal no apparent causes. Where was Dr Quincy all this time? So, the entire drama of the first half of the movie, spent by family and authorities opposing to a medical examination of the corpse is total nonsense. Finally, I hope I have not missed it, I do not recall if the movie explains how the poison was administered to the victim. Somewhere a hypodermic needle was mentioned. If so, how could the victim let anybody do that to him? There was no evidence he was rendered unconscious, and the scene of the crime showed no evidence of struggle. Was not this an essential element in reconstructing the crime? In summary, a reasonably entertaining show, with serious flaws. The script writer should be ashamed of putting together a story with absolutely no understanding of basic principles of medicine, medical legality, and logic.

Barbara Eshun🌸💫24/07/24 16:27

I like the actors that played the main characters. I just didn't like them together in this movie. Honestly, I found so many holes in this movie. First, when they found the guy dead, he flinched a bit. Second, he was a perfectly healthy man, why did they not want to do an autopsy? Third, I figured out who dunnit from the first scene that they were in. The main characters lacked chemistry. Their acting seemed really flat. I wish that they would have spent more development on the relationship rather than just kind of jumping right into it. I much prefer the relationships in Curious Caterer, Mystery 101, and Gourmet Detective than this one.

Recommandations de films similaires

Blog

Types courants

Comédie

Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.

Action et aventure

Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.

Crime et mystère

Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.

Science-fiction

La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.

Horreur

Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.

Romance

Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.

Animation

L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.

Romance

Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.