David Frankel
dans le rôle de Director
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The comédie film Tous les espoirs sont permis, starring Meryl Streep, Tommy Lee Jones, Steve Carell, etc., directed by David Frankel, was released on August 8, 2012 in Canada. It tells the story of Après trente ans de mariage, un couple d'âge mûr assiste à une séance de conseil intense d'une semaine pour travailler sur leur relation. This is a Comédie, Drame, Romance film with a runtime of 100 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 6.3/10 from 45,710 viewers.
David Frankel
dans le rôle de Director
Meryl Streep
dans le rôle de Kay
Tommy Lee Jones
dans le rôle de Arnold
Steve Carell
dans le rôle de Doctor Feld
Jean Smart
dans le rôle de Eileen, Kay's Friend
Ben Rappaport
dans le rôle de Brad, Their Son
Marin Ireland
dans le rôle de Molly, Their Daughter
Patch Darragh
dans le rôle de Mark, Their Son-in-Law
Brett Rice
dans le rôle de Vince, Arnold's Friend
Becky Ann Baker
dans le rôle de Cora, The Waitress
Elisabeth Shue
dans le rôle de Karen, The Bartender
Charles Techman
dans le rôle de Charlie, The Docent
Danny Flaherty
dans le rôle de Danny, The Bookstore Clerk
Damian Young
dans le rôle de Mike, The Innkeeper
Mimi Rogers
dans le rôle de Carol, The Neighbor
Ann Harada
dans le rôle de Ann, The Happy Wife
Jack Haley
dans le rôle de Jack, The Happy Husband
Susan Misner
dans le rôle de Dana, Doctor Feld's Wife
Rony Clanton
dans le rôle de Ronnie, The Taxi Driver
Vanessa Taylor
dans le rôle de Writer
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
source: Hope Springs
I was so excited to watch this 'seemingly' entertaining movie. All the good stuff was shown in the preview and the rest is garbage. Don't bother. Meryl Streep was, well, Meryl Streep. I find she has one role that she is capable of acting and they write movies to fit her in as the actress. I like Tommy Lee Jones as an actor, but THIS is definitely not the role for him. I was very disappointed in this movie and how they portrayed it to be something better/different in the previews. It was not all that entertaining - in fact it was uncomfortable to watch at times. There was no connection between Streep and Jones - which was possibly the biggest disappointment of all. Carrell, on the other hand, was outstanding in his role - and as always, did not disappoint. He didn't have much to work with, so he made up for where the script lacked. And it lacked A LOT!
Considering the word "funny" appeared on the box twice, you might expect a bit of humor. And you would be disappointed. I made the mistake of watching this with my wife on our anniversary, and it is seriously depressing. A "feel good romantic comedy"? To consider this a comedy, I would have to delight in the suffering of others, because that's all you get. I'm not expecting slapstick, but I was expecting some wit and gentle humor. Instead, all this film does is give a slice of life as to the struggles of a couple who have grown apart. Had this been presented as a drama, or even a "dramedy," I might be a bit more patient with it. But it is presented as a comedy and it fails... our moods were actually worse by the time the credits rolled.
I saw it the first time 10 years ago when it came out, and I was 16. It was the first time ever I saw or heard people over 50 in combination with sex. Because of that, this movie was a big deal to me. It's also warm, genuine and striking, touching. I watched it again today and yeah, it's an important movie I think. I genuinely thought retirees didn't have sex. Sure a kiss on the cheek and a touch on the arm when passing each other, maybe cuddling before sleep. But I thought that when you became older for most people the lust and desire just vanished, like, physically. Just want to say, this movie deserves a higher score than the 6.3 it currently has, and it, well, it springs hope.
a fine cast, a humorous trailer, and decent reviews led me to think this would be a good movie. i was wrong. the plot was hackneyed and predictable. boring, boring, and did i mention boring? if you've ever been to couples therapy or know someone who has, then there's no reason to see this movie. nothing happens. the couple sits on the sofa, the therapist makes supportive and inane comments and gives them assignments meant to bring intimacy back into their marriage. was the whole budget spent on streep's salary? is that why there were few scenes outside the therapist's office? after being together for 31 years, you'd think these people would know something about each other; obviously not. plus the fine supporting cast gets a few lines each. were they being paid by the word? i tried to get a refund half-way through but the manager said, "sorry we can't guarantee you'll like a movie when you buy your ticket." words to remember.
A very profound, yet humorous movie about a married couple who have lost the spark in their marriage. Their relationship became platonic after thirty four years. The wife's effort to revitalize the marriage was failing so she finally talked her hubby into seeking mutual counseling. The rest of the movie is full of good old fashioned belly laugh humor. The movie contains very adult situations and I would not recommend it for young people. The marriage counselor is excellent in his role as an adviser. I find the movie to be profound because of the hidden messages that it projects. Any married couple will see themselves in some of the scenes. The movie definitely promotes food for thought.
"Hope Springs" was an often uncomfortable watch. It's subject matter felt like eavesdropping on a couple's intimate quarrel and not in a good way. The movie made me squirm and fast-forward past awful sex-talk counselling. This wasn't really comedic at all; it's just a straight lack of integrity. There are a few chuckles and some cathartic type moments thanks to the acting talents, but this movie is not what I was expecting or entertaining You can get similar information from books or websites. Instead of characters being able to work things out or not through their own, we get a video-style shrink session with Steve Carrell. And the horrible cringeworthy intimacy foibles as well as heavy-handed music video "why" by Annie Lennox - ugh. Do not recommend. 4/10
My wife and I are in the middle of watching this wretched film. Man, I can't take any more. Please.... make.... it.... stop.... Now, to the actual review. It's bad, bad, really, really bad. In reality, that doesn't even begin to describe it. It's beyond really, really bad---way beyond. It's so bad that I can't even find a word for how bad it is. Ghastly? No, that's not nearly strong enough. Vile? No, it's worse than that. Truly painful to watch (and I watch Svengoolie all the time). I'm definitely going to have nightmares. Finally, I'm willing to wager that at least 90% of the positive reviews are from married women over the age of 50, where the roles are exactly the opposite of those in the movie. That is, the woman is the one who is not keen on sex, not the husband.
I love Tommy Lee Jones. I love Meryl Streep...but in all honesty, this movie was embarrassing to watch. Totally. Embarrassing. I was embarrassed FOR the actors and BECAUSE of the actors. It was awkwardly written, awkwardly executed and awkwardly acted. Tommy Lee is a phenomenal actor, but in one scene, he's leaning over Meryl and all you could see was this gigantic FACE (which, I might add, was a weird color?) and it was not attractive. Were I Meryl, I would have had a difficult time not shrieking to high heaven. He looked like a character from Men In Black. Not attractive. Nope. And his crusty curmudgeon thing is getting kind of old. Meryl is too mature and accomplished to be playing a nervous simpleton wife. Sad to think that these two stellar people were put in such an awkward and awful "romantic" comedy. It wasn't the beautiful re-connection of two people that truly love each other--it was just an embarrassment. Yikes.
Fairly painful to watch. I am not a prude, but watching sixty-somethings go on and on about sex, in their awkward way just got more and more icky. The production values, of course, were fine. They got a really talented supporting cast, and didn't give them very much to do. Tommy Lee Jones went against type and did very well with the shyness and discomfort of the situation. Steve Carrell (also against type) played it completely straight, without any glimpse of being the (often unrealizing) buffoon. And, of course, Meryl Streep, probably our finest living actress. She can hit the perfect notes on just about ANY role, and she does so here, playing it (in the words of Roger Ebert) determined but girlish. I moved my rating up at least ten percent just because of her. But I still could not recommend it.
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.