JFK - L'enquête

JFKFJ

Bon film !

source: JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass

It has been clear for long time and this program shows that in less then 6 seconds, at least 3 different shooters fired at least 6 bullets causing 10 wounds in 3 different men that faithful day! 1. First bullet missed the whole street and hit the road and piece of it hit a man standing there. First shooter! First wound! 2. Second bullet from behind hit Kennedy in the back. Second shooter! Second wound. 3. Third bullet also came from behind missed Kennedy and hit Connelly in the back. This bullet came through Connelly causing third and fourth wound. Same Second shooter! 4. Fourth bullet came from the side rare and hit Connelly in the wrist went through and ended up in his leg causing fifth, sixth and seventh wound. This is probably first shooter that missed his first shot. 5. Fifth bullet came from the front and hit Kennedy in the throat. Third shooter! Eighth wound. 6. Sixth shot also came from the front possibly from the same third shooter and hit Kennedy in his right temple exiting at the back of his head behind his ear. Ninth and tenth wound. All these shots and wounds had to be concealed hence alterations to the body, secret controlled autopsy, destruction of evidence and pictures, murder and suppression of witnesses and disgusting farce of Warren so called commission. Definition of commission is "choosing someone for a special piece of work to discover information and examine reasons..." they did opposite they compressed information and hid reasons and invented theories to prove pre decided outcome. Johnson, Bush, Hoover, Nixon, Ford, Warren, Dulles ... were all in it ...

The bullet that hit Connolly did not go through jfk, he said 100xs that it was a different bullet. That being said, only says that there was multiple shooters in dealy plaza that day. Not to mention all the cover up plus the botch autopsy? Ruby knowing LHO? The finger print on a box by the sniper window belonged to a Malcom Wallace, who was LBJ personal Hitman. The notes destroyed by the police and the med examiner. Jfk death is still unsolved. Congress needs to open all files to this Case. Enough already.

I've admired some of Olive Stone's work, but he is just a dog with a bone when it comes to disproved JFK assassination conspiracy theories. And he continues to try to make a buck be lying about the evidence. Recent ballistics tests show exactly how Oswald fired three shots from his book-carton walled-off sniper's west in the book depository. There was not "magic" in any bullet nor is the first bullet "pristine." Kennedy and Connelly were not sitting in a direct line, but Connelly was diagonally in from of the president. And Oswald shot the men from behind because that's how you shoot a president if you hope to get away with it. The problem I've had with the "Grassy Knoll" tramps/shooters theories over the years isn't just the ballistics, but that any professional assassins lying in wait there would have to be complete idiots to think they could get away with the crime; I doubt they could tie their shoes let alone hitting a moving target. I don't doubt there where many people who wanted JFK dead, and probably many who conspired with others to that end (we know of plans or attempts in Chicago, Tampa, and even in Palm Beach as early as December 1960), but Lee Harvey Oswald, hoping to be a hero of Cuba, beat them all to the punch. There were cover-ups and lies around the Warren Commission Report. The FBI lied about tracking Oswald to cover their ass. CIA lied about assassination attempts on Castro. Reasonable people have reasonable grounds to be suspicious. But when you step back from the cottage industry of conspiracy books and movies, you find that the mundane conclusion that Oswald acted alone holds up. He was a wannabe Communist hero. He was an abusive and estranged husband. He killed a cop as he tried to get out of town. He was, in some respects, like some of the fringe QAnon supporters we see spouting their nonsense today. Oliver Stone, I know you'll never give up this bone, but know that people who used to respect you think you're doing more harm than good these days.

The question is which streaming service will have the cahonnes to show it? Thank you Oliver Stone for continuing the battle to get the truth out.

With all the documents released since OS JFK Hollywood film we are not hearing anything new . More or less just more speculation and confirmation of theories already put forth . It is ok maybe if your new to the JFK conspiracy genre it is useful . Anyhow it's worth a watch just not that great .

Just more nonsense. People can't descern the truth as I happens in real time before their eyes. It's just utter nonsense. Amazing level of cherry picking "facts". Amazing levels of assumptions and jumping to conclusions. Reverse logic engineering. Something is mentioned as possible than later called back as fact and the foundation of new assumptions... and so the house of cards is built.

In 1991 Oliver Stone released the fictional "JFK", a sensational reinterpretation of "who killed JFK" that played very well as entertainment but really had little to no basis in facts. Now 30 years later comes this update of sorts. "JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass" (2021 release; 118 min) is the latest documentary from legendary film maker Oliver Stone. As the documentary opens, we get a synopsis of the events of November 11, 1963, with the infamous footage and pictures of that day, It's not long before we get to the Warren Commission and the subsequent US House investigations years down the road to get to the bottom of it all. Before we know it, we are deep into the weeds of the "chain of custody" of the "magic bullet" and so on... Couple of comments: This documentary is based on the 1992 non-fiction book "Destiny Betrayed: JFK, Cuba, and the Garrison Case" by James DiEugenio as well as on newly declassified Congressional evidence and of course also on Oliver Stone's personal interpretation of it all. Ah yes, Oliver Stone, the same guy who called bloodthirsty Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez "my friend", who is also quite chummy with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, and who felt the need to say that Hitler can't simply be painted as "good or bad". As was the case with his 1991 "JFK" film, if this is intended as pure entertainment, then there is nothing wrong with this. But alas, Stone does not intend it that way. No, he is here to tell us once and for all, what really REALLY happened. No, really! If this is to be taken seriously, this is nothing short on bewildering. Which of course is exactly what you get when you build entire truths based on conspiracy theories. Marjorie Taylor Greene and her QAnon ilk would surely approve! The reality is that with all of this information anyone can make an argument about any given theory. "JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass" premiered at this year's Cannes Film Festival pretty much to a collective shrug. It recently started airing on Showtime and is now available on SHO On Demand (where I caught it), Amazon Instant Video and other streaming services. If you have any interest in the murder of JFK and are looking for a wildly entertaining (if purely speculative take on it based on conspiracy theories), I'd readily suggest you check this out, and draw your own conclusion.