Matt Passmore
dans le rôle de Logan Nelson
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,中文
The horreur film Jigsaw, starring Matt Passmore, Tobin Bell, Callum Keith Rennie, etc., directed by an unlisted director, was released on October 27, 2017 in États-Unis. It tells the story of Des corps/cadavres apparaissent aux quatre coins de la ville, chacun d'entre eux ayant subit un sort macabre. Au fur et à mesure que progresse l'enquête, toutes les preuves pointent vers un suspect: John Kramer, un homme connu sous le nom de Jigsaw, mort depuis plus de dix ans. This is a Horreur, Mystère, Thriller film with a runtime of 92 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 5.7/10 from 101,558 viewers.
Matt Passmore
dans le rôle de Logan Nelson
Tobin Bell
dans le rôle de Jigsaw
Tobin Bell
dans le rôle de John Kramer
Callum Keith Rennie
dans le rôle de Detective Halloran
Hannah Emily Anderson
dans le rôle de Eleanor Bonneville
Clé Bennett
dans le rôle de Detective Keith Hunt
Laura Vandervoort
dans le rôle de Anna
Paul Braunstein
dans le rôle de Ryan
Mandela Van Peebles
dans le rôle de Mitch
Brittany Allen
dans le rôle de Carly
Josiah Black
dans le rôle de Edgar Munsen
Edward Ruttle
dans le rôle de Matt
Michael Boisvert
dans le rôle de Lee James
Sam Koules
dans le rôle de Melissa
Troy Feldman
dans le rôle de Officer Palermo
Shaquan Lewis
dans le rôle de Officer Solomon
Esther Thibault
dans le rôle de Asthmatic Woman
Lauren Beatty
dans le rôle de Carly Look-a-Like
Nadine Whiteman
dans le rôle de News Reporter #1
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
Bon film !
nice
Bon film !
Bon film !
Bon film !
The "Jigsaw" franchise had a reasonable beginning in 2004 and along the years, the downfall was easily predicable with terrible, incredible and worse and worse screenplays. In 2010, the franchise reached its bottom with the awful "Saw 3D". The franchise was resting in peace, but seven years later, the directors Michael Spierig and Peter Spierig decide to revive the infamous franchise with the writers Pete Goldfinger and Josh Stolberg. The result is a shameful bad movie with the most absurd and incredibly twists and overrated in IMDb. My vote is three. Title (Brazil): "Jogos Mortais: Jigsaw" ("Mortal Games: Jigsaw")
I was very excited when the first jigsaw trailer was online and my hopes were extremely high. When the film premiered I immediately went to see it and my god I was mind blown by the plot and characters. Like previous saw films the story is some what the same with a few added twist to each characters background. The puppet looks very awesome with new features added and Tobin bell still does the voice of him which was very amazing. I finally happy to see films like this getting back to what the term HORROR is frankly there hasn't been any good horror films that were great. Mainly nowadays horror films tend to be you're typical tacky cliché jumpscares gimmick with annoying loud banging sound and mainly focusing on cheap demon/ ghost filth " the conjuring, the babadook, bye bye man, ouija,sinister, oculus, paranormal activity and those dreadful insidious films. Finally horror movies are getting back to it roots of pure horror because humans are the one that you should be scared.
As a massive and avid SAW fan since its inception in 2004, I thought the film overall was pretty poor, which seriously pains me to say in a review. The film is lifeless and had no SAW-like qualities from the previous seven films in it. I totally understand Lionsgate reasoning rebooting the franchise and bringing SAW to the modern world with new characters, new colour palette, direction etc; however as an avid fan I felt robbed of all the hype I had in my own mind and expectation since the film was announced last year. Take nothing away from Charlie Clouser and his soundtrack, once again it is spot on! A very unusual take of the film to begin with, unlike previous instalments, it felt like a TV crime drama was just copied and pasted from a CBS show onto the editing software Kevin Greutert uses; at the time i'm there thinking what the hell is this i'm watching here! 100% not scary, jump scares weak. Hardly any gore or that SAW-style visceral piece of storytelling that made the franchise what it is. I understand the reasoning and story behind the traps they produced, but it felt like the writers made them all up in the space of 2 minutes without actually thinking about how to add that violent tension which makes the trap scenes unsettling to watch. To be fair, for me it does have one of the best twists in the franchise... but the ending was very cheap and stingy from a fans point of view. You come to expect that decent climax and the "wtf" moment like the previous seven films, but all I saw was nothing but garbage which was truly unsatisfying. The film clearly does not push itself further. I even shook my head slightly when it ended. I dunno, maybe i'm too hung up on the previous story/characters, and maybe I'm gonna have to watch it again to try and reap some benefits. But for me it is one, maybe the worse film in the franchise. Even after the film I kept thinking that I could have done a better job. The Spierig Brothers did an okay job with a very tacky script with only scene that stands out the most.
Wait. Was this PG-13? It sure felt like it was and Expendable. The most positive thing I could say about Part Eight of the Saw franchise is that the crew knew what made the latter part of the series' memorable: flashbacks, twists, bad acting and terrible dialogue. Maybe it was a hindrance that I decided to spend the entire 7 days prior to Jigsaw's release watching one Saw movie a day. Maybe I was sawed out. In a series that I originally thought got progressively worse, I found a little comfort in how closely tied the first seven were. It did feel like one long (approx.) 11-hour miniseries and, yeah, that did make the series feel complete. And when it was over, it needed to be over. I was glad it was over. Speaking of over, this is absolute overkill, only less on the killing. It was so mild, so held-back, my original positive turns into a negative whereas the creators forgot how much blood there should be. Basically, it's 10 years later and immediately as the movie opens, the game begins again. As in Saw-lore, the movie shifts from the cop side to a Jigsaw game. Will there be twists? Sure, but you predict them from the start. Will there be red herrings? Of course, but like the twists, you'll know who's behind this. Will there be redemption? Well, not for the series. The games played were enormously lame, the tired setups seem ancient and the gore factor was so dialed back, I thought I was watching the most gruesome scenes from the "vampire" movie, Twilight. Extremely minor things were updated (new technology – sort of – from the last outings,) but barely anything was new or brought in to refresh the series. Well, except laughs. Some of the traps were so hilariously bad, I seriously couldn't figure out if that was intentional or not. Perhaps they were meant as jokes to poke fun at their own series as the characters did constantly mock the designs as well. (If this was the case, then I will give them credit for that.) This movie did have potential, but it felt like it was written as quickly as the previously 1-per-year scripts. Only, this time they had 7 years to come up with something! They just blew it with a rehash of one of the worst in the original seven. I wouldn't recommend seeing Saw: Legacy, er, I mean, Saw VIII, um, Jigsaw! *** Final thoughts: After my Sawathon, here's how they rank: 1. Saw (★★★★/5 Stars.) 2. Saw II (★★★★/5 Stars.) 3. Saw III (★★★½/5 Stars.) 4. Saw VI (★★★/5 Stars.) 5. Saw IV (★★★/5 Stars.) 6. Saw V (★★½/5 Stars.) 7. Saw 3D (★★/5 Stars.) 8. Jigsaw (★½/5 Stars.)
Very disappointing. Not only they rehashed many ideas from the previous movies, but the final reveal was also done SEVERAL times in the previous saws. I won't go into details because of spoilers, but every time some plot twist happened in the movie I was like "Wait, they already did that in Saw X". In fact, I since I saw all the Saws (pun intended) I was able to correctly guess what the final reveal will be because like I said, they already done it before. And most of the traps were just plain dumb, some of them giving a lot of room for cheating, which broke the immersion for me, because the "gamers" were acting like idiots who for some reason switched their brains off and walked into them like sheep. Other traps required pretty much clairvoyance from the Jigsaw, because to set up them the way they went, he would have to see the fricking future. Early Saws used to be great, but this movie, and several previous ones, are just plain bad and the franchise needs to be put to rest at this point. And if the decide to make another one, just don't rehash the same stuff over and over and over again.
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.