Mark Pellington
dans le rôle de Director
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The adventure film Survive, starring Sophie Turner, Corey Hawkins, Dane Foxx, etc., directed by Mark Pellington, was released on May 12, 2022 in États-Unis. It tells the story of Lorsque leur avion s'écrase sur une montagne enneigée isolée, Jane et Paul doivent se battre pour leur vie en tant que seuls survivants. Ensemble, ils se lancent dans un voyage éprouvant hors du désert. This is an Adventure, Drame, Thriller film with a runtime of 108 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 4.5/10 from 1,144 viewers.
Mark Pellington
dans le rôle de Director
Sophie Turner
dans le rôle de Jane
Corey Hawkins
dans le rôle de Paul
Dane Foxx
dans le rôle de TSA Officer
Caroline Goodall
dans le rôle de Jane's mother
Lewis Hayes
dans le rôle de Chad
Makgotso M
dans le rôle de New Girl
Laurel Marsden
dans le rôle de Kara
Terence Maynard
dans le rôle de Dr. M
Jo Stone-Fewings
dans le rôle de Jane's father
Marta Timofeeva
dans le rôle de Young Jane
Elliott Wooster
dans le rôle de Phil
Thomas Flynn
dans le rôle de Triage Doctor
Alex Morel
dans le rôle de Writer
Richard Abate
dans le rôle de Writer
Jeremy Ungar
dans le rôle de Writer
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
source: Survive
I survived watching it...but none of the characters really deserved too.... Not really an enjoyable story to watch. They've tried to paste a backstory onto it which doesn't fit the movie, the acting is pretty awful, and the characters make the stupidest errors every step along the way. The sentimental emotional story is probably not what fans of this genre of movie are really after. They could have invested that effort into a more engrossing and exciting survival experience. Both the cringe factor and the smh factor are high with this one I'm afraid. Scenery was OK and some effects were decent enough though.
In the real world this blonde girl would be saying 'Get away from me!' 'Don't come near me!'. She'd rather freeze to death than cozy up to that guy to stay warm. It's also so obvious that it wasn't even cold. You couldn't even see their breaths. The mountain climbing shots were ridiculous & impossible. Overall this movie comes across as a lame music video for the lifetime network.
You'd think they would take bits and pieces from the ten episode series (which I never saw or knew existed) to fill in the 108 min runtime, but instead, you get 80% NatGeo repetitive scenic shots of mountains and landscapes, and 20% story that was riddled with plot and technical issues, and melodramatics with sappy dialogue and just as sappy score. For that matter, with all the negative feedback for the series, why did the writers and producers feel the need to punish audiences with the same boring story? This may have worked as a short film, but the ridiculously repetitive scenes full of filler and lack of any real interesting and suspenseful substance, made the 108 min runtime feel endless. Why even have the entire Life House portion at the beginning, when it was irrelevant to the rest of the story? If it was to portray her mental health issues, there was plenty of time during the long boring survival treks to bring that conversation up. Clearly terrible writing and poor directing is what failed this film, and that's too bad, because in the right hands, the concept actually had potential. To make matters worse, there were so many parts that were lazily written and dumb, it became cringeworthy quickly. For example, even a professional mountain/cliff climber would barely attempt the unbelievable treks that conveniently ended on the edges of all these cliffs and the climbs downwards. And no matter how dumb you are, why would anyone leave a crash site? So what if a storm is coming, the fuselage is still the best protection, with supplies right there to use and the best chance for survival, let alone the best chance for a rescue. To not know where you are and start walking without rhyme or reason, is just lazy and dumb writing. Don't waste your time with this sloth, even if you've seen the series and are the few who enjoyed it, I promise you this film will bore you. It's a very generous 5/10 from me, all going to the excellent cinematography and fairly decent performances by Turner and Hawkins.
The film begins with what seems like a psychological thriller where the psyche of the nail character is explored. After the plane crash, which was done very poorly, the whole story turns into a very unplanned story of survival. In this part, both characters are shown doing things that are unimaginable in reality, contrary to what the whole purpose of survival should be (the jump from the cliff to the tree was so so so cheap and amateur). Overall, it may be entertaining to watch but not much else.
Jane (Sophie Turner) is suicidal and leaving treatment despite still spiraling out of control. Her plane crashes in the freezing mountains. She and fellow passenger Paul Hart (Corey Hawkins) are the only survivors. The movie needs to get to the plane crash sooner. The treatment center opening section is unnecessary and unnecessarily artsy. All that can be revealed later with flashbacks and conversations. When she actually reveals her story, it's underwhelming. The opening is not adding much anyways. Her freak-out at the airport is more informative and more compelling. The plane crash could be better. It would be more logical if the plane crash happens when they are sitting side by side at the back of the plane. The logic is so false that I do wonder if he's a ghost. There is a lot that could be better. Their survival skills are trash although she has one great excuse. One would expect her character to be annoying but he's the annoying one. The locations are cool as long as they use the real locations. There is plenty of survival action but they are generally not filmed well. I don't know much about Mark Pellington but he doesn't seem to be a big action guy. This probably needs to be an action-packed survival film and they definitely need to get rid of the L word. They struggle to get that central premise through and that is what ultimately sinks this movie. I don't buy their connection and the L feels forced.
The movie is beautiful overall and carries an impressive message. There are some negative points in the thriller scenes that were not well made, but in general the movie is interesting and emotional, especially in the last scenes. I recommend watching.
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.