Keith Sutliff
dans le rôle de Director
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,中文
The crime film The Refuge, starring Keith Sutliff, Julien Cesario, Matthew Webb, etc., directed by Keith Sutliff, was released on July 22, 2019 in États-Unis. It tells the story of A getaway driver finds himself in harm's way when he gets caught up in a job involving casino heist money leading to a debt over his head. This is a Crime, Drame, Thriller film with a runtime of 98 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 2.8/10 from 1,640 viewers.
Keith Sutliff
dans le rôle de Director
Keith Sutliff
dans le rôle de Markus Hunter
Julien Cesario
dans le rôle de Frank
Matthew Webb
dans le rôle de Watts Riley
Cheyenne Buchanan
dans le rôle de Dixon Jones
Tom Conlan
dans le rôle de Virgil
Martin Copping
dans le rôle de Zander
Stefanie Estes
dans le rôle de Rachel
Tien Pham
dans le rôle de Vernon Boyd
Demetrius Stear
dans le rôle de Edwin
Reine Swart
dans le rôle de Staci
Keith Sutliff
dans le rôle de Writer
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
DO NOT BELIEVE THE RATING. Total rubbish. 1/10 maximum. Writer?/Director?/etc owes me 90 minutes of my life back.
This movie is terrible. Listed today as 7.9/10 with 1,303 votes, this rating is only possible with paid-for ratings. It's not worth explaining how bad it is. Just don't see it.
Simply don't, it's cheesy and boring. The whole film is just the main character (who happens to be the culprit of this disaster of a movie) talking in his phone driving his car.
I was another sucker believing the rating of over 8. The first 13 minutes is a guy driving his car around while the opening credits are being displayed. Then guess what the rest of the movie is predominately the guy driving his car around. I kept skipping forward and still hit him driving again, it is a 0 star movie.
This is absolutely not a 7.5 rated film. It's one of those "written by, directed by, produced by, edited by, casting by, starring.... you guessed it, the same person". Terrible writing, acting. Must be a lot of reviews from the "star's" friends as its a solid 3 star film and worth skipping.
Who ever gave this such a high score must have slept through it or it was given by Keith Sutcliff himself. Avoid at all costs.
It's a decent story and some of the images are gorgeous. But but but .... why oh why why is most of the movie spent on driving for endless stretches of time? How did this boring film score 8.2?
Do yourself a favour, grab an Uber and film it, probably be more interesting. Rubbish Rubbish Do not watch.
Truth is my first, and of all the driver,chauffour and wheelhandler movies ive seen this must be some of the most paralysing and lame events ever. you are for 60 minutes sitting in the backseat of a car listening to a growling engine, making turns and turns over and over. and nothing really happens. the rest is just humbug. ive been scammed thinks the grumpy old man, except for the score that save a bit of the glory of making a feature length film, and its sad to say that is the only interesting part of this flick, and it is a 2 at max.... stay away from this if you consider it,
I, like others, took the (initial) 8.7 rating as being indicative of a quality piece of cinema. In fact, my expectations were such that I, sad to say, watched this entirely from beginning to end. As the movie progressed, through endless and pointless driving scenes and occasionally broken up by new characters woodenly reciting lines that were not only cliched but didn't really help to build up any story, I grew increasingly disbelieving. Surely there would some pivotal moment that would occur to kick things into a higher gear? There was not. Surely there would be a revelation that would give all the proceeding driving / corner turning / gear shifting / checking of traffic / poker-faced acting some context and meaning. There was not. Once I realised that nothing was going to happen I was so close to the end of the movie I thought I might as well keep going. No surprise that the ending is just as terrible as the rest of the movie. Redeeming points - the visuals of LA at night (which is the only state you get to see anything in the movie - it's ALL filmed at night time) are nice. The sound track was pretty good, I thought, and perhaps the sole reason I managed to keep going. Normally I would not leave such a scathing and nasty review, however it's clear from the ratings that 'someone' manipulated things to get it to 8.7 in the first place. As this number is about 7.7 higher than what the actual rating should be, this is a real no-no. Avoid, avoid, avoid, but do keep an eye out for the sound track.
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.