Joel Hogan
dans le rôle de Jeff Miller
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The adventure film Open Water 3: les abîmes de la terreur, starring Joel Hogan, Josh Potthoff, Megan Peta Hill, etc., directed by an unlisted director, was released on April 27, 2017 in Australie. It tells the story of Trois amis se filment dans une cage plongée dans des eaux infestées de requins pour envoyer la vidéo à une émission de télé-réalité. This is an Adventure, Drame, Horreur film with a runtime of 80 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 4.2/10 from 5,605 viewers.
Joel Hogan
dans le rôle de Jeff Miller
Josh Potthoff
dans le rôle de Josh Miller
Megan Peta Hill
dans le rôle de Megan Murphy
Pete Valley
dans le rôle de Greg
Mark Fell
dans le rôle de Mark the diver
Christopher Callen
dans le rôle de Josh and Jeff's mother
Tara Wraith
dans le rôle de Girl lost at sea #1
Teagan Berger
dans le rôle de Girl lost at sea #2
Chris Bath
dans le rôle de Chris Bath
Robert Ovadia
dans le rôle de Robert Ovadia
Paul Adams
dans le rôle de Josh and Jeff's uncle
Wilma Adams
dans le rôle de Josh and Jeff's aunty
Mary O'Neill
dans le rôle de Girl at party #1
Nicholas Phelan
dans le rôle de Younger Josh
Matthew Phelan
dans le rôle de Younger Jeff
Harry Pinkney-Blain
dans le rôle de Younger Greg
Craige McPhersons
dans le rôle de Dead Body #1
Andrew Nathan
dans le rôle de Police Officer
La disponibilité peut varier selon le pays, la langue et la fenêtre de sortie. Certains titres sont inclus dans les abonnements aux plateformes, tandis que d'autres peuvent nécessiter une location, un achat ou un accès via l'application. Les catalogues de streaming et les accords de licence étant régulièrement mis à jour, les options de lecture peuvent évoluer. Pour une expérience de visionnage optimale, consultez la fiche la plus récente sur le service choisi et vérifiez la prise en charge régionale, les sous-titres et la compatibilité de l'appareil avant de commencer.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 victoires et 43 nominations au total
Téléchargez les derniers paquets MovieBox pour mobile, les versions FM et les APK compatibles TV. Choisissez le paquet adapté à votre appareil et à votre région, puis suivez le guide d'installation officiel pour une compatibilité et une sécurité optimales.
...and it leaves me hope that one day too I can make a film.I'm guessing this "genre" is along the lines of Shark Weeks episode about a giant great white that was prehistoric, but compared to open water it got more watches.
I dunno what most these people are complaining about,.THIS MOVIE ROCKS,.. One reviewer said that all the people in this movie were BAD people, Well.WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD~! ,.It was more realistic that these people were cry baby, silver-spoon, dimwits that love adventure seeking,.It was like watching Richard Bransons kids,.The sharks in this movie were DOPE to say the least,.There was some REAL terror in this flick to be sure,. I didn't expect the acting to be top notch,.but it was at least average and somewhat realistic,.There were some filler scenes in the movie,.you can basically kind of burn through the first 30 mins of the movie to be sure,.but it made it more realistic,.It is found footage so the camera is going to make you a bit nauseous,.but I've seen MUCH WORSE In short,.this had ALOTT more action than any Blair Witch movie,.was better and scarier too,.The sharks were top notch,.and I think it is the best movie in the OPEN WATER series,.I RECOMMEND highly if you like to see people eaten by sharks!
Watched this film today really enjoyed the plot. Also enjoyed the reality of the sharks' behaviour. Compliments to the director and cast
I had seen a lot of shark movies. The Reef (2010) and Open Water (2003) are quite authentic but there are also other great movies. By looking at its cover I could tell it's one of those lame and cheap wannabe suspense movies. Furthermore, it turned out to be a very good concept: there's a complex relationship between the main characters and the footage is impressive. You have a feeling you're one of them. Worries, struggles, anxiety, fear... it's both horrible and admirable. I really liked this movie. Somehow different approach, but in a positive way. Don't expect much. But at least give it a try.
Just when I thought it was safe to go back in the water, a found-footage shark movie swims my way. Cage Dive takes the well-worn hand-held camera/faux documentary route to tell the story of three Californian adrenaline junkies - Jeff, Josh and Megan (Joel Hogan, Josh Potthoff and Megan Peta Hill)- who travel to Australia to experience great white sharks up close and personal. Unfortunately, their thrill-seeking experience doesn't go quite as planned when a freak wave capsizes the boat, leaving the friends stranded in shark-infested waters. I was actually enjoying this found-footage shark movie up to the point where an argument over the use of a flare results in the characters accidentally setting fire to their inflatable life raft; at this point, the film well and truly 'jumps the shark', after which it slowly sinks further and further into the murky depths of bad film-making. And when brothers Jeff and Josh forget about the sharks to have a scrap over Megan, with whom they are both in love, the film finally hits rock bottom. To director Gerald Rascionato's credit, the shark attack scenes are deftly handled and realistic (I guess that the sharks are CGI; if that is the case, they're extremely well done), resulting in a reasonable amount of tension, and there's one satisfyingly nasty moment where we see a survivor with the side of his face hanging off, but for much of the time it's just three whiny over-privileged idiots bobbing around in the sea. You'll be longing for the fish to start biting again. 4.5 out of 10, rounded up to 5 for IMDb.
I find it difficult to understand why directors and writers make and write films like this. It is well known that most film goers do not enjoy found footage films that pretty well consist of the actors screaming and shouting at each other whilst doing incredibly stupid things. The viewer feels no empathy, just irritation with characters. The viewer does not feel suspense or fear because fear and suspense are swamped by irritation and annoyance. The viewer wants the characters to die. And so it is with this Asylum-esque teen-scream (almost) offering. The incredibly stupid thing here was so unbelievable in it's stupidity that it would have been a kindness and relief for the film to have ended there. I wanted Megan to die. In the main the viewer wants an intelligent script, good acting, plausible behaviours,intelligent decisions and mature likable characters. Why directors not understand this? Why is it that they do not take lessons from Jaws or The Reef? Why do they take lessons from Asylum films? It is a mystery. Oh..the sharks were good though, particularly in the suddenness of one death where one shark was a stalking horse!
The characters in this are so unlikable, they are all idiots who I actually wanted to die. You need to be able to root for your characters but whoever wrote this shitbox doesn't know that and I have no idea how it got made with the crap script it had. Everything was generic, guy loves girl, girl loves brother, oh no! It was 30mins of them being tools then 50 minutes of them in the water screaming at one another, there was no suspense no tension, as I said, I wanted them to die. Bad writing. How do these people have jobs?
Open Water 3 starts off somewhat promisingly but ultimately fizzles out. It starts of when two brothers and a girlfriend of one of the brothers decide to go to Australia to film themselves Shark Cage Diving in order to enter the footage into a reality TV-show which could potentially earn them $100 000. During their dive however, a freak wave overturns the boat, and they together with the crew members and other tourists are left floating in shark infested waters. Soon almost everyone is separated and trying to survive while awaiting rescue. The shaky camera found footage filming gets annoying pretty quickly. As does the relationship between the two brothers and the girl. One of the brothers is planning to propose to his girlfriend not knowing that his brother is also in love with her. The same girl gets more and more hysterical as the movie goes on and eventually ends up torching a life raft they were fortunate enough to find floating after almost a day in the water. At no point in time in the raft do they show any signs of exhaustion. This and the fact that these three at no time give any indication that they have dived before or have any clue about what to do also makes the movie less believable. By this point in the movie however the viewers probably couldn't care less because the ending is predictable and is in fact given away in the first few minutes of the film anyway when its stated that what is on the screen is footage from a camera found on the ocean floor. The acting could have been worse but is nothing special. Overall not really worth the time of watching.
If Trump can become president why not a F movie become B. Honestly people, it is an ocean of water movie. Nothing to it, Water proof cameras whoopee do.... They should of stopped at the first one but since their budget is $100 bucks why not make a series of awful sequel? Seriously would you watch this on TV? nope! Then why in Gods name would you watch this and pay for it? SMH (Means Shaking My Head)
Bon film !
Un décryptage détaillé des récents changements de prix, des raisons pour lesquelles les utilisateurs repensent leur installation et de la façon d'évaluer une solution alternative sans perdre vos habitudes de découverte.
Découvrez la bonne méthode pour installer l'APK Movie Box : d'abord les bases de version, puis des étapes d'installation propres, et enfin comment choisir entre TV, iOS, Web et application.
Une critique détaillée expliquant pourquoi Project Hail Mary se distingue en 2026 : qualité d'adaptation, narration scientifique, profondeur émotionnelle et réactions du public.
Les comédies sont conçues pour divertir par l'humour. Les formats populaires incluent la comédie de situation, l'humour à sketches, la comédie au travail et la comédie romantique.
Les œuvres d'action mettent l'accent sur l'excitation, le conflit physique, les personnages héroïques et une narration rythmée. Les œuvres d'aventure reposent souvent sur l'exploration, la survie ou des voyages épiques.
Les drames policiers suivent des enquêteurs, détectives, avocats ou journalistes qui résolvent des affaires criminelles. Les récits à mystère encouragent le public à découvrir des indices avec les personnages.
La science-fiction explore la technologie futuriste, les voyages spatiaux, l’intelligence artificielle, les réalités alternatives et les hypothèses scientifiques.
Le récit d'horreur crée le suspense par la tension psychologique, les événements surnaturels, les monstres ou les scénarios de survie.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.
L'animation rassemble des œuvres pour enfants, familles et adultes, allant du contenu éducatif aux récits dramatiques complexes.
Les récits romantiques se concentrent avant tout sur les relations, les trajectoires amoureuses et l'évolution émotionnelle des personnages.