Fear the Invisible Man

Good movie!

Good movie!

Good movie!

cool movie

This movie started out as a kind of good movie. But when the diversity came, it destroyed the whole thing for me, so by watching for 15 minutes it'll all died down to a one star. You see by not only destroying the culture of the white people you had to put in people that was not in England at that time. I stopped watching after 15 minutes, so if you want to not include people to see this movie, come on, just put all the diversity do you can into your future projects. This movie started out as a kind of good movie. But when the diversity came, it destroyed the whole thing for me, so by watching for 15 minutes it'll all died down to a one star. You see by not only destroying the culture of the white people you had to put in people that was not in England at that time. I stopped watching after 15 minutes, so if you want to not include people to see this movie, come on, just put all the diversity do you can into your future projects.

Needless to say that I had actually never heard about this 2023 thriller titled "Fear the Invisible Man" prior to sitting down to watch it. And I had no idea what I was in for here, so I have to admit that I wasn't really harboring much of any expectations. Which, in turn, meant that director Paul Dudbridge had every opportunity to impress and entertain me. However, the storyline in "Fear the Invisible Man", as written by Philip Daay, Helena Gergelova and Monika Gergelova was sort of mundane, bland and rather uneventful. And for a thriller, that doesn't exactly spell top notch entertainment. The movie was sort of lacking a drive, and it felt like director Paul Dudbridge was just filming the thing whilst still in neutral gear. Yet, I still managed to sit through all 100 minutes that the movie ran for, though I have to say that I was not really particularly entertained by what transpired on the screen. I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble, except for actor David Hayman (playing Wicksteed), and he was barely in the movie at all. The acting performances in the movie were actually fair enough, despite the fact that the actors and actresses had surprisingly little to work with in terms of script, dialogue and characters. Visually, however, then I will say that the CGI effects in the movie were actually surprising good for a movie of this type. And while the movie didn't make a lot of use of special effects, whatever effects were there were actually helping to make the movie a bit more interesting. "Fear the Invisible Man" is not a movie that I will ever return to watch a second time, as there was hardly sufficient contents to support this first viewing. Nor is it a movie that I will recommend to fans of the thriller genre. My rating of "Fear the Invisible Man" lands on a three out of ten stars.

One piece at a time, every great classic is being destroyed. Every day, I hear the words of George Orwell in his most famous work - "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right." This was no exception. Being a fan of the HG Wells' work, I really wanted to like this. Unfortunately, this was 100 minutes wasted. The movie itself was as boring as watching paint dry. Besides that, for a story about the invisible man, we seem to spend most of the movie following the girl around instead. In the original, the process not only turned the inventor invisible, but also insane. With this incarnation, we are never shown anything at all about his past pre-transformation, so we have nothing on which to base his current obsessions. If you ask me, he doesn't act any differently than most people walking around today. The acting was subpar, but that wasn't the worst. The worst was the apparent complete lack of a continuity editor. So many things are wrong that anyone competent at the job should have caught. For instance, when the man gets shot, there's no blood anywhere - obviously, because his blood would be invisible as well. But when the wound is bandaged, suddenly the blood becomes visible seeping through the gauze. But it's ok, because we're told that his blood becomes visible when it coagulates. :eye_roll: Really? OK, so why, when he steps on a broken bottle later do we see blood dripping and pooling on the glass? A wine bottle is taken from a wino and broken - mid swig - yet there is no liquid in the bottle when it shatters. When books are thrown in to a fireplace, there burst into flames as if they were made of magicians' flash paper. I could go on and on, but I have no desire to bore you just because I had to sit through this snoozefest. Finally, as with most modern era flick, the past has been modified to reflect current attitudes towards casting... if you know what I mean. Not to mention the mixed affections being placed in front of us as every turn. Do yourself a favor. Either watch the original 1933 version or better yet... read the book while you still can. I'd go so far as to say that even "Abbott and Costello Meet the Invisible Man" would be better time spent than watching this.

Thank you for this movie (to Paul Dudbridge - as I just discovered him). I enjoyed it a lot! As fan of invisible man (H. G. Wells character) I looked for every movie ever done - form classics to contemporary (I enjoyed "Memoirs of an Invisible Man" so much), so, I looked forward for a new movie... this one is a pleasant surprise!! It has the atmosphere, the invisibility, the decor and most of it... the language. Of course... is not a 200 million budget movie, but there are moments I forgot that! Good job! I encourage the producer and the director to go ahead with "Invisible Woman". I encourage Amazon Prime to put it on the streaming platform - you won't regret it!! H. G. Wells fans - you won't regret this film as well...it's a hidden gem!

Good movie!

The script is based on the famous H. G. Wells classic. Films involving invisibility tend to be engrossing science fiction. In fact it is hard to mess one up. This one does just that. What few characters we see in the film might as well all be invisible. The lines are weak and not well delivered. Cade Griffin (Mike Beckingham) is invisible in the first scene, of which could be a bad teaser, and is then visible. When he injects the formula, he is permanently invisible. No becoming visible at an inopportune moment. When shot, he seeks the help of an old friend Adeline (Mhairi Calvey) who couldn't deliver the lines. He does sneak a peek at Evie (Emily Haigh) while bathing, which we only see from the back. Very boring all around Guide: No swearing, sex, or nudity.