James Morrison
as Bill Marshall
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Kiswahili,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,هَرْشٜن هَوْس,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
The horror film Intersect, starring James Morrison, Richard Dawkins, Jason Spisak, etc., directed by an unlisted director, was released on September 15, 2020 in the United States. It tells the story of A group of young Miskatonic University scientists invent a time machine, only to learn that they are being manipulated by mysterious, unseen forces from another dimension. This is a Horror, Sci-Fi, Thriller film with a runtime of 119 minutes and its worldwide box office is not listed in the available detail data. It has received a rating of 3.5/10 from 4,014 viewers.
James Morrison
as Bill Marshall
Richard Dawkins
as Q42
Richard Dawkins
as Computer
Jason Spisak
as Ryan Winrich
Abe Ruthless
as Nate Beaumont
Leeann Dearing
as Caitlin Webb
Jose Rosete
as Abner Rosen
Dartagnan Driscoll
as Young Ryan
Kelcey Bligh
as Young Caitlin
Ryan Adelson
as Young Nate
Jacob Lacy
as Young Abner
Michaela Dean
as Emma
Frank Aaron
as Detective
J. Benton
as Onlooker
Garrett Boyd
as Geoffrey
Joe DiGiovanni
as Bully
Slade Hall
as Larry Fincher
Lawrence Krauss
as Professor
Availability may vary by country, language, and release window. Some titles are included with platform subscriptions, while others may require rental, purchase, or app-based access. Streaming catalogs and licensing agreements are updated regularly, so playback options can change over time. For the most accurate viewing experience, check the latest listing on your selected service and confirm regional support, subtitle options, and device compatibility before starting.
127A Smithfield Road, Frederiksted, Virgin Islands
Castle Rock Entertainment
21 wins & 43 nominations total
Download the latest MovieBox packages for mobile, FM builds, and TV-compatible APK versions. Choose the package that matches your device and region, then follow the official install guide for best compatibility and security.
source: Intersect
This is no doubt the worst movie of all times, the plot, the dialogues, the poor acting, the extremly boring timeline. I have nothing against low budget movies with poor effects, casting and technical struggles. The problem here is that almost every line in this movie is a parody of itself. Feels like it was made by a 10 year old. Ive paid to see it on iTunes, it felt better getting robbed by a pocket thief 20 years ago when I was a student and really needed the money. Ps: all the reviews over 2 out of ten are fake, new accounts with only 1 review. Watch it if you want to be amazed by how a bad a movie can be, but please don't pay for it like I did, you'll be sorry.
Any time a writer tries to tackle time travel it's a sticky situation.. and this movie actually does a pretty good job of handling time/dimensional travel... so it's with great disappointment that the entire rest of the storyline and execution are so bad. I mean, really bad. An endless string of non-sequitur events, bad CGI "aliens", and an unexplainable ending. They could have focused SO much more on the development of the time machine, the alien influence, the aftermath, instead of things like school bullies, love interests, and dinner outings. Ah well, better luck next time
I'm almost disappointed. Based on some of these reviews, I was expecting a new cinematic low, but Intersect never got there. Commenters claiming the acting is wooden or dull probably didn't watch the movie. If anything, the actors are a little emotive and melodramatic at times. All in all, though, i thought Intersect was good. It was interesting and held my attention and I was entertained...and that's basically what I look for in a movie.
The film has some good ideas behind it and the special effects are good, but !!! saying that.. the acting is atrocious and the makeup of the actors is tragic. The background cast behaviour overall is not of a scientist, you can tell they are struggling to perform their role. Like I stated in the title worth a watch, its not the worst out there, but its more like a Sci-Fi channel premiere ..
When you watch a movie there are many things we take for granted until you experience something this bad. The premise for the movie is the only reason I have it two stars and the fact that I was able to get though it without turning it off. But, in the interest of full disclosure I did get on the computer during the last 30 minutes to look up a camera lens... Bad acting Story did not develop well Ending was obviously an afterthought There were times in the sequence of events where you couldn't really gauge the period because they did not differentiate the actors well enough. It was just bad.
...Which is the ONLY reason to watch this disappointing wallpaper of a movie! I can only imagine that he just provided audio clips for his role as the voice of the computer system, little realising that his part would be the outstanding performance of the whole movie. Without being disrespectful of the good professor, I have to say that this elevated position in the cast is almost entirely due to the rest of the cast, they being either entirely wooden or entirely "Over the top" in their emotional performances, while Dr Dawkins, calm measured voice reminds us that the rest of the cast are either engaging in "Recreational substances" or coming down from using them! It is my habit to continue watching bad movies until they end, so as to present a rounded view of what was presented. In this case, I lasted one hour into the dreadfully slow progress of the script. At that point, I felt like it had been several hours! I, therefore, took the unusual step (For me) in abandoning the mission. So I'll never find out what happened to the characters. And, the key point is, I didn't care about any of them*! * Well I hope the computer survived! 🙂
It's true. I hated the character "Nate" played by talentless abe ruthless, so much that i actually laughed and cheered when he was liquified
Totally agree with karrijunttila - what a really bad movie!
And boy was I bored to death... Good filming, most of the main actors acted well, but I never saw such dramatization since Bollywood soap opera. The fact that the story is told backwards doesn't help at all. CGI were pretty ok, but the director wanted to make movie AND art at the same time and of course failed like many others. It takes time to make a good movie and tons of experience to make art. This one failed at both.
A detailed breakdown of recent pricing changes, why users are reconsidering their watch setup, and how to evaluate an alternative workflow without losing your discovery habits.
Learn the right flow to install Movie Box APK: version basics first, then clean installation steps, and finally how to choose among TV, iOS, Web, and app usage paths.
A long-form review covering why Project Hail Mary stands out in 2026: adaptation quality, scientific storytelling, emotional depth, and audience reactions.
Comedy stories are designed to entertain through humor. Popular formats include situational comedy, sketch-style humor, workplace comedy, and romantic comedy.
Action titles emphasize excitement, physical conflict, heroic characters, and fast-paced storytelling. Adventure titles often feature exploration, survival, or epic journeys.
Crime dramas follow investigators, detectives, lawyers, or journalists as they solve criminal cases. Mystery stories encourage audiences to uncover clues alongside the characters.
Science fiction explores futuristic technology, space travel, artificial intelligence, alternate realities, and scientific speculation.
Horror storytelling creates suspense through psychological tension, supernatural events, monsters, or survival scenarios.
Romantic stories focus primarily on relationships, love arcs, and emotional development between characters.
Animation includes works for children, families, and adults, ranging from educational content to complex dramatic storytelling.
Romantic stories focus primarily on relationships, love arcs, and emotional development between characters.