Skanda: The Attacker

h

I have not seen ever any action movie like this. The director is a great man he do very good work in every moment. And our hero work very good. Also Good script and duologue and use a good screen shift. I will discuss it in two part part one why I give it 9 star ar part 2. Why did not give 1 star Part one: 1: Use a very good story 2: Use very impressive dialogue 3: The Action clip is equal to siuuuu 4: Hero play a very big and important role so smoothly 5: The heroin also play a smooth role 6: Screen shift us a very impressive work 7: Introducing character is also impressive 8: And the Songs is very impressive work part two: 1: Something the action clip is so dramatic as look like hero is thor😅 2: The last clip of this movie the anather hero director have to give more story on movie.

Good movie!

Good movie!

Good movie!

Good movie!

"Skanda," directed by Boyapati Srinu, who previously helmed the successful "Akhanda" with Balayya Babu, falls short of expectations. The film follows a routine Telugu storyline, offering nothing fresh or innovative. One of the film's glaring flaws is its songs and their placements, which are poorly executed, significantly contributing to its downfall. The music by Thaman, known for his high DJ sounds, disappoints once again. Ram Pothineni does his best in the hero role, especially in portraying a rugged character, but the lack of a compelling storyline and supporting elements hinders his performance. Sree Leela's presence in the film seems unnecessary, as there's no clear reason for her character's inclusion. The first half of the movie is relatively better than the second half, which struggles to maintain the audience's interest. The film hints at a sequel, but given the quality of this installment, it's safe to say that we don't need a "Skanda 2." The action sequences lack the over-the-top physics typical of Boyapati's older films, which may disappoint fans of his style. If you're still interested in watching "Skanda," it might be a better choice to do so through an OTT platform, as it fails to live up to the standards set by Boyapati's previous work in "Akhanda."

I have no clue what state Boyapati Srinu was in while making this film, but one thing is for sure he was definitely under some influence. Suddenly a twin appeared out of nowhere and there was no parental or maternal relation/connection between the two, how is that possible? The director didn't even care to explain. And he also had a love story. Wow! Out of thousands of bullets fired at him even a single bullet couldn't touch the hero, and at the end of the movie officer says that the other twin, who appeared suddenly, destroyed the most dangerous don of columbia who also had an army of 30K goons.

I am dissapointed actually..What i liked about this movie is emotional scenes,bgm and mass dialogues..What i dont like is too much gory violence not suitable for family audience,stretched fight scenes too much build up..The villains really make us angry but Rapo Makeover was worst i didnt like it look at all but his scenes were good..Akhanda was my movie of the year 2021 thanks to Balayya acting,Bgm,Songs and Great Directorial by Boyapati..Each frame and dialogues gave us goosebumps with packed dialogues even make enemies stumble..He tried same formula but sorry Rapo it didnt work out well hmm. Please give a proper comeback Rapo and Yes Sreeleela added beauty to movie which was plus..Akhanda 2 must be a comeback for Boyapati..

My rating for the storyline of Skanda is 2/10 my rating for the action sequences of Skanda is 6/10 Overall, I would give Skanda a 3/10 rating. While the action sequences were good, the weak and illogical storyline significantly detracted from the overall experience. It seems like a missed opportunity, as the potential for a great movie was there. The director's failure to create a cohesive narrative is a major drawback. Given the widespread dissatisfaction with the storyline and the overall negative reception, it seems unlikely that we'll see a Skanda 2. It's a shame, as the action sequences showed promise, but a bad first impression can be hard to overcome. Why would anyone invest their time and money in a sequel when the first installment was such a letdown?